Justice For-All

Archive for May, 2011|Monthly archive page

Police kill women…

In Freud and the Police, Police abuse women, Police Personality, Profile the Police on May 31, 2011 at 10:17 pm

”]and police kill their wives, their ex-wives, and often kill themselves afterward, which is not a bad thing.

Sometimes they even kill and wound other police officers while they are at it, which is not a bad thing either, and sometimes cops kill their “loved ones” on sacred cop holidays, like Memorial Day, which is even more metaphorically cool.

But Jonathan Agee killed his wife, while a 12-year-old daughter watched, and it could likely have been prevented

From the story in CNN: “The bloodshed began at 11:30 a.m., when Jennifer Agee, 30, pulled into a Sheetz convenience store parking lot in Roanoke, Virginia, Perkins said. Trailing behind her in a marked Franklin County sheriff’s office car was her ex-husband, Jonathan Agee. The 32-year-old sheriff’s deputy from Boones Mill was off-duty at the time.”

My question is “when will America wake up from its adrenalin filled, police-power induced coma? For instance, what was this off duty police sanctioned murderer doing driving around in a marked squad anyways?”

I don’t really need an answer either, because I know the answer. For the last several decades, America has inserted police into every day affairs, and into every television show, in a mass propaganda campaign to cause us to “respect the police,” “fear the police,” and especially to NOT QUESTION POLICE AUTHORITY.

It is that exact superficial authority that led to the death of 30-year-oldJennifer Agee–the preventable, predictable crimes of police can and should be highly policed–but they’re not.

Imagine if the store clerk who witnessed this act of policeman murdering his wife had been taught to question authority? Imagine if the general public along the route of this homicidal cop had noticed his road raging driving habits, or his intense glare in the direction of his wife’s car?

Imagine if they—you, me, us– had been taught to question police authority?

Now imagine if we as an emerging American society begin to remind ourselves every single day of the importance of questioning police authority. We might have a new world and fewer cop wife’s to bury (not that burying cop-wife’s is a bad thing, because every time a cop kills his wife, it prevents them from passing along cop genes and soiling the  gene pool).

But domestic violence rates amongst police are two to four times as high as in the civilian population.

The old excuse that always creeps out in the press is that American police kill people because of the “stress of the job,” but evidence points to pre-existing flaws in the character of police men and women.

But police are not alone in hiding, minimalizing or forcefully stifling their victims of domestic violence. Prosecutors are complicit in covering up police crimes, and domestic violence is just one more form of sociopathic police conduct.

According to www.purpleberets.org “In San Diego, a national model in domestic violence prosecution, the City Attorney typically prosecutes 92% of referred domestic violence cases, but only 42% of cases where the batterer is a cop.”

The police personality is already predisposed to violence masquerading as heroics, as many of them emphasize physical fitness, and emulate sports oriented, and  ideology.

But they also are trained to be violent, and to maintain a posture of self-righteousness and control which negates them being viewed as what they are.. They are also willing liars, and manipulators of facts, and are trained in the police academy to be “offensive.”

In other words, American police are socially approved sociopaths, and it’s time to police the police, so their peculiar violence doesn’t spill any further than it has already.

They inhabit a perverse western state of mind that believes in “pre-emptive war( the excuse we used to invade Iraq, and lie about Saddam Hussein),” and “preventive war ( the basic philosophy that operated after Pearl Harbor).”  Whichever of these double speaking phrases you choose, they both mean essentially the same thing these days.

It means that the United States and its international police power means “we” through police and soldiers, maintain a right to murder people first, and ask questions later, as long as the propaganda powers can gain popular support for the US brand of homicide, and sell the American public on the flag draped casket full of ideas that claim they–“We” are acting in self defense, but acting first; the bully who says “hey, are you looking at me?? before it socks you in the eye.”

In other words, for American and other western police, self defense is interpreted as a right to be offensive.

So, obviously, when Jonathan Agee killed his wife, he was acting in self defense, just like all the other cops who kill their wives, all over the western and westernized  world.[ here , here, , here , here ,  and endlessly elsewhere]

They also inhabit a curious realm within the western philosophy of capitalism, and uphold only money, and property rights, while destroying the lives of others through a steady stream of adrenalin feuled false heroics, and implicating the weak, the mentally ill, and the poor in crimes of addiction, or poverty.

In the words of Robert Kennedy:

” There is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions: indifference and inaction and slow decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skins have different colors. This is the slow destruction of a child by hunger, and schools without books and homes without heat in the winter.”

Bobby, I would only add that a new, and far more insidious killer than race or poverty has emerged ever present, and ever victorious in American society: the power of a police structure, or a police state that breaks the laws it makes, and abuses citizens in ever increasing numbers. They reign superior, even if in their own minds, and that is a bad bad thing.

The police embody power, and the disproportionate exercise of that power over the lives of others, and, sometimes, over their own family members. They are the new middle class ideology of class control; the new bully pulpit; a typical American answer to a failed ideology of adrenalin pumped, gas power fueled mass consumerism.

So, pre-emptively, we ask: maybe it’s time to police the police? Because police are becoming more and more offensive every day–even on the sacred cow day of Memorial Day.


Police hack computers

In Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Personality, Profile the Police, Supreme Court complicit with police power, Uncategorized on May 31, 2011 at 9:49 pm

…and often plant evidence, malicious computer code, and other mal-bots, but it is remarkably hard to prove.

Even harder to prove once they manipulate, destroy, or outsource the evidence.

Despite years of the FBI claiming noble moral high ground

”]its secret programs of hacking, placing back doors in victim computers, and planting viruses on cell phones, America now claims the right to call other countries hacking an “act of war?”

WASHINGTON — In its first formal cyber strategy, the Pentagon has concluded that computer sabotage by another country could constitute an act of war, administration and military sources told NBC News on Tuesday, confirming a report in the Wall Street Journal.”

Most hacking done by the United States government is intent on breaking in to computers of foreign nations and dignitaries. Using CIA complexes in Langley Virginia and its surrounding regions and in sync with the NSA in Fort Meade MD, they do the majority of their cyber-crime. American spy networks also use libraries and college data bases that are often unwitting hosts of hidden CIA , and NSA use or  infiltration.

But the real dirty work is often outsourced to private companies, or done by the U.S. military from offshore locations in the Eastern Bloc countries, the Philippines, or by using front companies that provide server space in other host nations.

‘How the world works’
Rich Mogull, analyst and CEO of Phoenix-based security research firm Securosis, noted that governments and defense agencies have been spying on each other throughout history. Computers have just made it easier to do so electronically.

“This is just what countries do,” he said. “It’s the unfortunate reality of how the world works.

Our government hides its tracks fairly well, using massive networks of phony and anonymous IP addresses, and malware that writes code onto hacked hard drives, and then erases itself after their dirty work is done.

But who can stand against the overly- burdensome rights of corporations who are known to flout policy and law? American corporations have formed unholy alliances and smashed the rights of other nations for years, most recently in Colombia, where America has for years been the primary distributor of cocaine, murderer of workers, and suppressor of the truth until it became a politically untenable position.  (abused people and relatives of murdered victims sue Chiquita for 1 billion)

Perhaps the biggest threat to the rights of human beings, and individuals, who uphold individual rights for human beings, is the privatization of spying. Given what corporations have shown us in the past, the future of actual cyber-security looks glum, negotiable, and unaccountable.

Memorial Day is for Martyrs to Freedumb [draft]

In Freud and the Police, Police Personality, Profile the Police on May 31, 2011 at 1:54 am

…and despite all the lip service the US and its police state have given

to the horrors of “muslim,” and other suicide bombers, America is chock full of police and soldier personalities, willing to die in–but especially to kill in–wars that America brings to countries thousands and thousands of miles away from America. They even justify it on religious grounds, just like the fanatics they claim to protect us against.

and the full power of the FEDS is on the lookout today for the worstest of evil-doers–fake war heroes!

Still, our military and our police are even complicit in the deaths of Americas peace heroes.

However, Memorial Day is as good a day as any to barbeque burgers, and to fill your head with memories of baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and Chevrolet’s. It also a holiday that was likely started by the wives and mothers of the failed American Confederacy.

And if that doesn’t murder your instinct to think things through, or to pacify your oral fixations, try a few patriotic poems. They are mind numbingly bad, and virtually guaranteed to make you not proud at all to be an American.

Here is one that is chock full of bullshit that tells us that if it weren’t for America’s hired killers—our military—we wouldn’t ha

ve no freedumb.

Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X meet bef...

Image via Wikipedia

The Ultimate Sacrifice:
A Memorial Day Poem

We set aside Memorial Day
Each and every year
To honor those who gave their lives
Defending what we hold dear.

In all the dark and deadly wars,
Their graves prove and remind us,
Our brave Americans gave their all
To put danger far behind us.

They made the ultimate sacrifice

Fighting for the American way;

We admire them and respect them
On every Memorial Day.

By Joanna Fuchs

 I don’t have time to analyze the multiple layers of deep bullshit contained in such patriotic drivel, but I can tell you that the guys who go overseas and bomb Iraqi( Colombian; Nicaraguan, El Salvadoran, Chilean, Viet Namese, Cambodian, Laotian, Chinese, Phillipine,  Afghani, –etc.) babies aren’t working for me.

My contribution to helping numb your mind is a calendar for you to use every year, when it comes time to honor the war-makers, and the war-mongers who died because America is not creative enough to come up with an economic structure that does not put murder before mental endeavors to make money. http://www.usmemorialday.org/calendar.htm

Those same guys who claim heroism by importing violence overseas, missed the boat here at home—they would “kick my ass” for impugning their bogus sense of patriotism.

Why? For having a different opinion, or for promoting peace? Or for resisting the social programming that demands I go to war “for America,” or in the very least uphold its “honor,” by complicit silence?

No: they would kick my ass in part because their mental profile includes latent homosexuality that has formed a reaction formation that makes their desire translate into urges to touch other men violently.

Oh, that and the fact that Americas entire MKULTRA created “social program” trains its children to be killing machines, and encourages violence, particularly in males. They did that throughout the 1980’s until today with vdeo games full of war, and Ritalin. They did it with MKULTRA. http://www.theblackvault.com/

These warlike males and females adulate and idealize a mindset of violence and power, at the cost of sacrificing individual impulses and sublimating  those impulses so they can “serve” their countries masses—at the actual expense of those masses . Their libidinal human impulses are replaced with impulses of idealized and ritualized violence directed at others, for the sake of power alone.

They are the physical representation of Americas dysfunctional social repression, and proof of the effectiveness of a class based and commercialized rewards system.

They are walking proof that America’s power grab after World War 2 was a grab at wider social control,( today we see a repression of rights here, while the media blabs  which was implemented in mind control programs like MKULTRA, and MONARCH and MK Delta that  went  way beyond paperwork, ‘conspiracy,’ or ‘isolated victims’ of CIA plans and schemes.

[if you are unfamiliar with these CIA programs that were used against American citizens, with the FBI’s full approval, here is a synopsis of these programs which are very much in effect today, and here are some of the very few documents that remain http://michael-robinett.com/declass/c000.htm after the CIA shredded virtually all of the evidence of what they were doing ]

These programs transcended mere patriotic songs, and slogans, and translated ideas of a commonality in individual people into a mass mentality sans individuality,  that could be controlled by the CIA and the FBI. Local police acted for them as agents to identify non-conformers, and to pro-actively label dissenters.

Our formerly draft based military is now a civilian mercenary force that goes not where freedom from repression is required—they never did ( the Congo, Haiti, Rwanda during the genocide) –but rather sells themselves collectively to whoever can pay in oil dollars for their time.

Our military are zombies, who sold themselves into an ideological program of mass social control; one that and posits that there are only two kinds of people in the world: good guys, and bad guys; evil and not evil people; for “US” and against “US”.

Real heroes die waging peace.

Gandhi died at the hands of his own bodyguards.  Martin Luther King died under the surveillance, and under the watchful eyes of the Memphis police; John F. Kennedy died while surrounded by the Secret Service.

Peace lovers mourned when John Lennon died under the watchful eyes of a CIA operative who chatted with Lennon’s assassin.


[For right wingers, conservatives, and cops—or others with mediocre intellects, and laten/repressive/oppressive tendencies, here is the cartoon version of events of how the CIA and the FBI tracked and likely assassinated Lennon, http://www.mackwhite.com/lennon.html

These modern American heroes—adrenaline charged bullies, really—make claims to risk their lives for mine.

In case there is no mistake: I never did, and never will give you my permission to make such  false and self serving claims as that you are fighting for my freedom, and withdraw the implied consent of any truly freedom loving Americans for you to parade around in our names as heroes..

You flag waving heroes are not working for the good of America, but rather you work for the consumer society—whose  heyday is coming to its twilight.

You are working for your own personalized and co-opted sense of freedumb, and getting a paycheck to do it.

And most importantly, you hired killers, if you actually gave a shit about freedom, you would create, and then spit upon the graves of those who have should fall,

One persons’ fetish of idealization for “sacrifice” is another persons realization or awareness that nature weeds out the violent and the stupid; but also that these same will kill you for non-conformity.

And, American society pays them off so that they don’t do harass, harm, or murder truly peace loving sentient beings here at home, unless directed by some mindless order to do so.

For my part, I am staying home: all those patriots out there are just looking for some excuse to be heroes, hunting the arch enemy of dead soldiers everywhere–like people who claim false heroism–instead of looking at the enemy in their own pathological personalities.

All that beer and cop-hot-dogging makes them overly brave.

So I am thinking of peace today, or in  other words, those of http://www.democraticunderground.com/

 “I’ll be spending this Memorial Day meditating on the despicable rulers named Bush Cheney Rumsfeld Rice Bolton Abrams Rove etc., truly a rogues’ gallery, who are stealing the precious lives of the un-named (if Sinclair stations black out this year’s Ted Koppel reading of their names) working and poorer classes to pursue the unconscionable agenda of America’s monied[sic] “elite.http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103×128691

Police Tamper with the American Internet

In Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police destroy and createevidence, Police Personality, Uncategorized on May 26, 2011 at 10:46 pm
”]RAF Menwith Hill, a large ECHELON site in the ...

[ Note: this post was one of several that I made from public internet terminals that are firewalled, with AV and anti-spyware. Some of those terminals are frequented by people who fit certain “profiles”–minorities. The post below actually happened more than two weeks ago. This version is from an auto-save, and much of the links were lost]

on May 4, 2011 at 9:59 pm

To any and all fellow bloggers, IT professionals, et al: have you ever noticed how slow/impossible your computer connection becomes when you write about the sort of things we write about here?  It’s enough to actually alter your thoughtstream, and change your brain chemistry.

As reported by http://www.abovetopsecret.com, there is technology in use today that does just that.

“According to literature by Silent Sounds, Inc., it is now possible, using supercomputers, to analyse human emotional EEG patterns and replicate them, then store these “emotion signature clusters” on another computer and, at will, “silently induce and change the emotional state in a human being”.

To make matters worse, somehow today, I cannot create content links using the simple wordpress ‘Insert’ button, or create links!

I am seeking advice, and anecdotes of similar experiences.

It is classic paranoia to believe that “someone is hiding in my internet,” but it becomes a factual anecdotal experience if others are aware of it too.

In the very least, it is my theory that the military, FBI, and its related programs of Echelon and Carnivore have more than one function. The basic function the government tells us is that htese are “listening” programs, i.e., they “listen for keywords”and terrorists, etc.

However, I believe that they have other functions as well, not least of which is to slow down, stop, redirect, or otherwise interfere with conversations they don’t want civilians to have–conversations like, um, POLICE MISCONDUCT and BRUTALITY.

So, in this light, here are some basics of my theory:

1) Echelon, modern secret programs that function better than ol’ Carnivore, the FBI, NSA,  et al are actually using programs to deliberately causing internet chat to slow down, and inserting themselves into emergent dialogues–so that they essentially can alter the outcome of conversation.

2) Programs in place that claim to “monitor” internet activity are actually used to alter the speed, and content of that delivery.

3) rather than they claim, the intent of internet surveillance is actually to inhibit, control the flow of, or stop certain memes, ideas, and conversational “transactions.”

4) Sites, like ours here, are not only monitored, but also directly interfered with in order that police powers can manipulate data, and alter speech patterns.

So in short, the government practices a form of prior restraint of ideas, with some of the tactics outlined above, and we are unwittingly part of one of the greatest CIA mind control experiments ever.

Cops Get Off on Raping Woman

In Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, police and repressed homosexuality, Police Personality, Profile the Police on May 26, 2011 at 9:55 pm

The Innocent Faces of New York Police Officers Moreno and Mata, a police couple( a couple of police) that recently got off on rape charges

…but are found guilty of lesser charges.

The case against Officers Kenneth Moreno and Franklin Mata- two of New York’s finest—came to a conclusion today, though it did not come not prematurely. The jury deliberated for seven days before finding the two men not guilty of rape.

However, they were found guilty of three misdemeanor charges for official misconduct.

According to courthousenews.com, the pair “face up to a year in prison for each of these counts at their sentencing on June 29. Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly also confirmed that the men would be fired.”

The undisputed facts: Moreno faked a 911 call in order to gain access to the woman. The duo of Moreno and Mata visited her on four occasions, and lied to their supervisors about it.

The pair encountered her in her bathroom on numerous occasions. The pair spent the night in her apartment without her consent, as Moreno laid next to her, ” spooning with her,” and Mata stood guard, or “napped” in the womans living room.

For the woman’s part, “she slipped in and out of consciousness, [and] testified that she woke up to Moreno pulling down her tights and raping her when she was too drunk to resist.”

Likely due to the fact that they did what they are trained to do at the police academy, which hones the police personality into well oiled lying machines— and apparently NYPD favors the lie of omission, because police lying on the stand makes them look like what they are: liars, and juries don’t like that.

These days, rather than telling the old fashioned “cooked up” story that all cops agree should be the truth, cops are altering their tactical deceptions. Cops these days seem to be aware of how bad they look on the stand as they blatantly lie, so they take the Ronald Reagan approach to deception: I don’t recall; I can’t remember, I don’t know. ( you might recall that Ronald Reagan was concurrently a drug dealer, and the President of the United States )

But Moreno and Mata were one step ahead of the prosecutors ( cops who are on trial are usually in collusion with prosecutors).

Cops Win One for the Gipper! [Official Portrait of President Ronald Reagan].

Cops Win One for the Gipper! Image via Wikipedia

Not only did they practice that Reagan d

efense, and they likely concocted their story BEFORE it came to trial, so that their lies would work together–but they blamed the victim, in a real subtle way.

The cops story went like this: “A recovering alcoholic, Moreno told the jury that he checked up on her privately in her bedroom and bathroom throughout the night to counsel her about drinking, while his partner took a nap in the living room. He claimed she was drunk enough to need his nightlong assistance, but not drunk enough for him to call an ambulance.”

The jury believed the concocted story by Moreno and Mata raised reasonable doubt, and so they let them off the hook with the real charges of rape, and burglary.

The Police Commissioner had been under pressure to fire the couple since the charges were first laid out by the prosecutors, as official misconduct was clearly at the heart of the case.

However, it is exceptionally rare for the police to police themselves, and cops are hesitant to discipline one of their own.It takes amazing and bullet proof evidence for a prosecutor to bring a case against one of its own–and then, only if its own fuck up so badly that they put other cops at risk of being revealed for the crimes they commit.

Worse, most police misconduct, homicide, and police rapes get glossed over in the police internal reviews, and the public never sees the results. One snapshot of police who commit homicide and brutality comes from a quick Google: in Los Angeles found that, in 1991, rates of internal prosecution resulted in external prosecution wherein ‘13%of brutality claims against police were prosecuted for the people, and it resulted in about half of the officers being sentenced.

In 2005 “Of 442 officer-involved shootings reviewed since January 2001, Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley has not brought a single criminal case. And only three of 314 alleged excessive-force cases examined in the same period spurred criminal charges, according to office spokeswoman Jane Robison,” meaning that LA does not investigate, or charge police who murder, or use excessive force.

So, in New York at least, it’s possible that cops can rape women and get off on it. Even if they lose their jobs, it’s a small price to pay for those brief moments when they can express their inner souls.

But it is still easy to file a false rape allegation, because false rape allegations are rarely, if ever prosecuted.  So get to it, girls.

Police enforce mediocrity, and conformity

In Freud and the Police, Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Personality, Profile the Police, Uncategorized on May 26, 2011 at 12:06 am

…and they will beat you, Tazer you, spy on you, and imprison you without cause under false charges–they can even break

Conformity should be rendered obscure, not books

Conformity should be rendered Obscure, not books

your arms and get away with it.

However, long before it occurs to you that you must revolt, you will likely have been beaten into submission, or set up on some false charges.

Robert M. Lindner, was a psychologist who told us a little about that in 1956, the year he died. Were it not for his concept of a Rebel Without a Cause, we would likely never hear  his name, save for a  footnote or two in the annals of psychology.

More interestingly, his work “Must We Conform?” provided a piece or two of the template of  the police personality.

Police can harass you, compile false data about you, plant evidence in “official records” about you, and attempt to set you up for crimes before you realize that you must begin to fight them back. By then it will be too late, because by then, they have won: they have created in you the exact thing that gives them their purpose, and their excuse for being.

You are outside the “norm” of mediocre.

You, resistant in the least to their brutal, unaccountable attempts to smash you into conformity, will be looked upon as criminal, and you will be abused by police and the social mechanism;  and actions that fight back, or seek to uncover their crimes at the most extraordinary end will be seen as acts of your—not their–deeper criminality, and threat to “society.”

Sadly, “American society”is not on the side of individuals, and has grown to the bloated and untenable position in the world of exporting violence for oil, and believing in lies before truths, as they defer only to “official sources,” and “scientific opinions”, or art that takes only the form of propaganda;  and a media that guides them like sheep.

Ironically, if you don’t believe me, Google “American Society”. Before you get even one hit on our actual society, you get auto-suggestions at the top of the listings, and The American society of Plastic Surgeons, right at the top.

If that isn’t a suggestion of the importance of enforced conformity, what is?. When you actually get the results, Wikipedia’s definition of the term is on the top, followed immediately by the American Cancer Society. This is how Google, even, ranks the importance of American society.

Robert M. Lindner’s “Must We Conform?”

In the specific context of this blog, and its purpose, one can understand the police personality and the violence they exert over the non-conformist with the translational lens of Freudian pro-script, but we must look upon the Freudians as what I think they really were, as philosophers-doctors who were on to something about the organic mind; an organ with biological impulses in contrast to imposed societal structures that influenced the mind.

But Freud alone isn’t going to supply the answer for why American society has become overly afraid, and willing to kill others first, ask questions later; to character assassinate others first,  find facts later; to criminalize one type of mind over another type of mind.

Whereas the individual struggles daily with the contradictions of hypocrisy in the social condition, or marginalization at the hands of the mass, the police are many things, but what they are not are individual, humane, or clever; intellectual or creative in interpreting causes of individual impulse.

What police are is the antithesis of what one should be, as, in the words of psychiatrist Robert M. Lindner, police and others in the social order are “psychopaths,” and, as the conformity enforcers of the “mass” they have become the ‘ leaders’ of the common Americans .’

We should not be, nor should we consent to be,  ruled by psychopaths.

Lindner’s book, written in 1944 was  called Rebel Without a Cause: The Hypnoanalysis of a Criminal Psychopath, the title of which, and some of the essence of substance, was later adopted in the famous 1955 James Dean movie, Rebel Without a Causewhich has been added to the preserved films of the United States Library of Congress‘s National Film Registry as being deemed “culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.”

Without digressing into the endless loop of discussion of how flawed Lindner’s hypoanalysis was in that case, or wade into Freudian practices and beliefs have been refuted or debunked, critiqued ad infinitum, and debased in modern mans eye’s, there are ideas and concepts that were described by these early Freudian philosophers which remain as pertinent today as they were then.

Lindner wrote, In  his 1954 book “ Must We Conform?” in regards to the end-stages of any given civilization, that the appearance of a “new” breed of men, “whose genesis may be discovered among the conditions that conspire to petrify the forms by which the given civilization or society has chosen to express itself.

“These men, I think, are always psychopathic, dedicated to action and violence rather than the contemplation and compassion.”

He was talking about a modern police state, like Stalin, Hitler, and the emergent McCarthyism and its ominous presence in America.

“They prepare the way for the elevation of a Leader, and on his assumption, and thereafter in his name, rule. He in turn, carries the unconscious drama one step further by getting himself killed and immolated. By his death, he brings about the blood bath in which the civilization dissolves; while elsewhere another society is being born—to follow the same unconsciously motivated timeless cycle.”

Without unpacking all that is Freudian and arguable in Lindners’ statement, what is important is his belief that the leaders of modern (“mass men” as he called them) humans are always psychopathic, and always the violent, action driven antithesis of contemplation, or compassion.

That describes the police mind to a fault.

Henceforth, they are driven by violent, murderous impulses, and that has wide ranging implications for interpreting what the American society has become: a society that is ruled only by the violent overlords; oppressors of freedom, intellect, creativity, or compassionate interpretations of the actions of those who are different.

Rarely, they themselves rebel against their own positions, and do good in the world through individual acts of rebellion against their own violent natures. But those rebellions carry a cost, as Sgt. Joseph Bozicevich of Minneapolis can now testify.

Police are the primary upholders, trend setters and  brutal enforcers of mediocrity. Anyone different will be persecuted, marginalized,  and contained until hyper-masculinized police power  can control, displace, or otherwise conquer ones lack of desire to compete for the position of either a leader or a follower of the mediocre.

You must adjust, writes Lindner.’ Adjustment is the element of humanity that the oppressor seeks, your compliance to its authority at all times is the adjustment they seek; your eradication of individuality, and its consummation by the collective “herd” ,’as he calls it.

You must adjust, he writes, is  ‘the command above the door of every church, synagogue, cathedral—your passport to salvation. They have conspired in the name of the spirit against the spirit of man—though most of them were founded upon protest, and rebellion, these are now the things they hold in horror.’

You must adjust. Is ‘the slogan emblazoned on the banners of all political parties; modern man is homo politicus…Love, hate, friendship, enmity—these have come to have political significance,’and have become the bartering chips of our American society—the transactional devices of deciding who the police can, and cannot victimize.

But there is no freedom even here, since conformity is of the essence of all the political organizations that rule over us. Paradoxically, the systems that most loudly proclaim the right of human liberty, and offer themselves as instruments of change are those systems which oppress most heavily.’

The surrender of individuality is urged, or forced…In the congealing amber of politics the individual is pressed and imprisoned.”

Lindner most presciently anticipated the state of affairs the U.S. is in today, with police misconduct the norm, not the exception, largely because “The sciences have sold themselves to the status quo,” he writes.

“For psychiatry, psychology, and the medical or social arts that depend from them have become devil’s advocates, and sorcerers’ apprentices of conformity. Joined in the criminal conspiracy against human nature, they have poisoned the last oasis for the relief of man. Of all the betrayals, their treachery has been the greatest…equating protest with madness, and non-conformity with neurosis…they labor with art and skill to gut the flame that burns eternally at the core of being. “

These sciences, and the highly politicized and polarizing debates in the hard sciences are especially noteworthy because they are in essence the root cause of the condition of over-policing and poor policing that we suffer from today.

Especially noteworthy as the linkage and unholy matrimony of feminist rape culture studies, or rapeology , allied with polarizing academic liberals,  and police science that has birthed upon our nation children that willingly assume gender based, war-like postures from birth, and police are a reaction formation against the idea of weakness, or the possibility that they themselves could be raped [ this is a subject for a later post].

Hence, our society depends almost exclusively on men being in fear of weakness–fear of being raped, but worse, by living in fear of discussing it.

Modern American media, which is composed of only five companies  [ video here  ],  caters to men who uphold violence based endeavors, like  ESPN, and Bill O’Reilly, ensuring that different versions of male psyche are diffused, demeaned, or demonized.

They cater to women who are indoctrinated through Oprah, the View, and such other propaganda to believe that they are perpetual victims of men (but not men who are police or police structure affiliated; that is a forbidden dialogue); meanwhile every other show on television panders to the false notion that police are heroes of one kind or another, rather than psychopaths who have bullied themselves into the American mind.

And all media perpetuate the myth that police are safe for your children, and provide “idols” who kids look up to, with a constant stream of police “drama” ( cop porn).

Our media carries stories of the ongoing wars that our society has groomed men and some women to fight, and herald’s police dogs as heroes , and punctuates them side by side with the story that rape of women and girls is everywhere, even in your backyard or shed. Never mind that actual stranger rapes are  incredibly rare  in America, or worse, that in the story above, some residents say the girl herself was complicit.

Rather than asking if rape culture is growing, we should question the very bizarre projection, and sexual fetishization of women, and girls at the expense of discussing males or male sexuality in positive terms.

We should question whether and how much our government and our CIA is involved in production of pornography as a tool of social control, rather than repeating CIA disinformation about bin Ladens purported porn stash  [ and we should be re-visiting this odd state of American sexuality and its connection to the notorious CIA  projects MKULTRA and MONARCH which used children as sex slaves  and here ];  and  question an even more bizarre American society bent on the corruption of the natural and basic sexual impulses of human beings.

Lindner wrote at a time when shock therapy and lobotomies were being used on human beings—he wrote that if the psychiatrists, and the drugs and psychotropic dopes; if the evil madness of psychiatrists aligning themselves with the status quo; and if the literature and the “soft persuasion and counsel that apes wisdom” doesn’t “cure” men into conformity, and level him with the “mass,” then

there remains in the arsenals of adjustment  the ultimate weapons: the little black box for shock therapy, and the swift and silent knife for psycho surgery. From the skies the lightning and thunder are stolen to be discharged into the brain, the seat of reason, the home of evolution, and the treasury of manhood. In the convulsion that follows, resistance ebbs and another sheep is added to the flock…”cured” of his humanity.”

Reagan closed the asylums, and Americans built jails to house the mentally ill, right alongside the actual rapist, and murderers. Freudian psychoanalysis was replaced with American drug conglomerates, the dope dealers replaced with scientific opinions that work toward conformity, and against freedom.

I posit that the police powers and their Tazers have replaced shock therapy, and in collusion with media produce the dull-minded programs and propaganda like scared straight, rather than examine the root cause of social dysfunction in America .

Despite the modern trend to debunk the Freudians, the psychologists are as Lindner predicted: merely tools of the police power structure, in collusion with conformist visions of “society,” rather than visionary visions of peaceful possibility.

Police abuse women

In Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police destroy and createevidence, Police Personality, Profile the Police, Supreme Court complicit with police power, Uncategorized on May 24, 2011 at 11:17 pm

…and usually, they get away with it, because cops  hate  “hundred pound weaklings.”  They deplore what they consider “weak,” especially if that weakness is in men.

When cops beat men up, they almost always get away with it–even if those men are in wheelchairs!

In the case of police beating women, society takes a different approach, and assumes the women who are victims of police violence are innocent, and up goes an outcry. But not always:  Lisa Wareham was assaulted

Police abuse women

by Officer Livio Beccaccio, a veteran of the Orlando, FL police department  and, as usual,

the cops report contradicted the video-taped evidence. But the cop didn’t know there was video tape when he told his initial lies in an “official report”.

She likely would have been seen as guilty,without the exonerating video-taped evidence that revealed police lies.

According to clickorlando.com,  she said “It happened so fast. I was so scared. There is no way to describe it.”

Wareham, a single mother who was out with her friends at the time of the incident, said she could not believe what happened.

“I went to sit up and I felt something in my mouth. I spit (my teeth) out. I didn’t even know what to think,” she said.

Wareham said there was a disturbance nearby and a man was shoved into her. She said as she was questioning the man as to why he bumped into her, Beccaccio led her away and hurled her to the ground.

She barely weighs one hundred pounds.

Cops lie in their reports all the time. We know that. Lying in police reports is the norm,not the exception. They teach lying  in the police academy, and the courts often uphold police lies,but with videotape, their lying abilities versus the cameras unfaltering eye are a game changer.

Notice the highlighted text below:

“Although the Supreme Court has often said that truth is an imperative to justice, (9) we now know that police officers, (10) the key investigative component in our criminal justice system, lie, even under oath. (11) i How often do the police lie? No one knows for sure, but credible reports of police lies are common. In addition to police lies captured on video and audio recordings, trial judges have become increasingly skeptical about police testimony in suppression matters. (12) Juries have found police lies using a beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard. (13) Some judges, prosecutors, and criminal defense lawyers believe that the police often lie successfully at pretrial hearings to avoid application of the exclusionary rule. (14) Commissions have convened, studied, and documented police lies. (15) And there is circumstantial evidence of police lies, along with other police misconduct, from the work of the Innocence Project and a recent empirical study conducted by Brandon Garrett. (16)”

[article here]

Police also routinely violate and abuse women, but they are very good at covering it up; police departments generally have a no-talk rule about their own domestic disputes, and women ( and men) who live with cops are often intimidated into silence by their gun toting mates.

But video tapes can make the difference between another routine report written by a cop being taken as truth, or revealed as the lies they are.

This video-tape  might get the officer suspended, reprimanded, or otherwise, but I doubt it. Police departments around the country are slow, or lax to discipline officers who abuse the public trust–there are just too many others in “the public” who condone police brutality.

Worse, the police have the full complicity of female police officers in the ranks to do their dirty work for them: according to clickorlando.com, OPD Lt. Barbara Jones sent an email to …on Wednesday confirming that the incident “is being reviewed and under official investigation.”

Two things in that statement  smell like pork, and the beginnings of a cover up:

1) the cops use female officers to deal with police assaults on women to diffuse the public perception of police as a  ‘male dominated’;this is the key to police disinformation campaigns in regards to the women that police abuse.

2) the phrase “official investigation,” which always amounts to the police strategically adding up the factors that damn them, and comparing them with factors which could make their lies plausible, to see  how they should  run the final story.

But it is a grand thing when you can catch cops in action, or investigate a whole departments corruption, like San Francisco’s PD, whose police misconduct, fraud, lies, and abuses were also caught on tape

We’ve heard the official story before, and it’s always B.S., sprinkled with heavy levels of disinformation and lies.

The problem is two-fold:

a) police profiles themselves are lies, and often are merely excuses to over-extend police powers. ( think seat belt laws, Terry stops, and the implication that you are guilty of something if you refuse a police search of your car)

b) the public is largely unaware of the police authority test*: if a cop stops you, you must comply to its orders. They are seeking compliance first, sorting  issues of right from wrong later.

Police authority has gone wild, and the public at large is unaware of these small abuses, until it is your brother, sister, or other family or friend that has suffered.

The small abuse of the police authority test has led to the larger abuses, and now it is time to arm yourself against the police- buy a video camera, and use it to record police home intrusions,brutality, and day to day events before you lose the right to do it–and double and triple back-up your recordings, because police have long histories of destroying video evidence.

Remember: they work for us–or at least,they used to– not the other way around, and today, they actively work against us–against the U.S. in us.

Document it: if you don’t flex your rights,you will lose them. So know your rights about recording police behavior.

United States Supreme Court endorses men being raped.

In Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, police and repressed homosexuality, Police destroy and createevidence, Profile the Police, Supreme Court complicit with police power, Uncategorized on May 24, 2011 at 1:34 am
Image via Wikipedia”]The current United States Supreme Court, the h...

US Supreme Court {sans Justice Kagan}

….but not double or triple stacked.

And: American Police are Rapists who thrive on rape culture ideology, a flawed model of social control that can work for, or against them. Flawed because from its inception and implementation by some of the justices that sit on the court today, it set up a judicial system that allowed the accused to be publicly tried, while the accusers remain anonymous, like in the eastern bloc countries, and repressive South American regimes. Rape and Security theater.

I am not the only one to notice how our country uses sex charges, false rape statistics, or politically motivated rape charges, either.

Naomi Wolf, writing for Reuters, says that rape culture ideology ” means that policy outcomes can be advanced nowadays, in a surveillance society, by exploiting or manipulating sex-crime charges, whether real or inflated.”

I said as much just the other day. Oh, wait: I said that 5 days before Ms. Wolf did.

Police and social mechanisms that should protect us from police misconduct encourage, condone, cause, and cover-up American men being put into conditions that cause violence and rape: prisons. America relies on sex-crimes charges to stifle dissent, and men must be triple stacked in shitty, hot, overcrowded and unconstitutional conditions before the court does anything about it.

Many of those men are in prison because of a “bad habit,” or an “addiction,” rather than actual, real, person to person violent crime.  Men encounter and learn violence in prison, and the police mechanism routinely uses prison rape as a tool to control men. –while ironically, our entire culture, and its press slathers over what “might be” happening in other countries, and collective outcry weeps for the human rights of women in countries we do not, or cannot control.

American prisons are rape and violence factories, but also, many of the men in prison today are there because police and court mechanisms have willingly and historically been complicit in prison rapes and violence.

However, they are silent in the very least about the creation of a drug addicted society. Not one single drug scare that was ever initiated by police powers has ever worked to keep citizens off of drugs. American police, and their military counterparts are also the worlds biggest drug dealers. History tells us that.

Rather than creating American manufacturing, or other jobs, influential Americans have only encouraged the growth of police and military powers—powers that cause rape and kills people overseas.

The police in America are certainly the foremost advocates of placing dissenting American males into harm’s way—and even further away from those men relaying such messages to foreigners. Our police structure only wants the mythology and marketing tools of “baseball, hot dogs, apple pie, and mom’s lemonade” message to get out to foreigners. [Original commercial here]

Shockingly, today, the United States Supreme Court issued a rare decision that upholds prisoner’s rights, and ordered the State of California to end the overcrowding conditions in its prisons. In doing so, the courts order is an even rarer ruling that upholds human rights—here, in America.

Despite the fact that one of the most prominent sociopaths in America, Antonin Scalia— sits on the Supreme Court today, the high court once again backs cuts in Calif. prison population.[ more on Antonin Scalia here:]

While the USA routinely violates the human rights of foreign people, and the human rights of Americans alike, it is rare that we acknowledge the human rights abuses in America, much less enforce existing laws against such abuses. Through collusion of the police and the press to cover-up such human rights abuses here, and the courts routine failures to act against such abuse that has led to perhaps the worst human rights conditions in America since slavery.

Fortunately, we still have the foreign press to report human rights violations in America, and foreign media is not on the U.S. payroll—yet. So we have to look to foreign newspapers and foreign broadcasts in order to ascertain the truth about our own country.

While America today is delicately dancing around the fact that it manipulates and censors the internet, ( and here ) China Daily reports that “The United States reports the world’s highest incidence of violent crimes, and its people’s lives, properties and personal security are not duly protected.”

On its face this statement is true, however, the Chinese press, though refreshing in its breadth and comprehension of American human rights abuses against American citizens, fails to acknowledge the root cause of this purported violent crime: we live in a country where our police and our media are in collusion to initiate violent contact with men, and regularly remove fathers from households in order to begin the indoctrination of the children in the households.

America is relatively a single mother society, and fathers are not allowed to be fathers in lower income brackets, whereas upper income brackets rely on a sliding scale of what makes a “good man,” versus a “bad man,” and cops are always the “good men”.

Police make initial contact with children, and then begin indoctrination of children as who “good guys” or “bad guys,” are–because American police thinking is black and white, with no shades of grey—American police suffer from a great dearth of creative thinkers–and regardless of the crimes perpetrated by police and state mechanisms, the courts uphold cops almost by rote.

American society depends upon men being locked up on trumped charges, so that the police and their allies can get to the kids, and create good little killing and birthing machines that willingly go off to foreign wars.  If they don’t–well, we have a place called prison for the misfits.

Police propaganda campaigns like the out dated D.A.R.E. program cause our children to become aware of drugs and drug abuse much earlier than any child needs to hear about such social programs, while countries like China–who historically battled with the west to keep the western police powers and their opium out of its borders–China focuses on and teaching children the basics: the three R’s.

Worse, every time our police or military get involved in a “foreign war,” the police power imports more of the exact drugs that it claims to “protect” its citizens from. Every single US policy against drugs has increased the drug flow to America. Most US drug policies have increased the US presence as dealers in international drug markets.

It would be safe to say that every where there is drugs, the US “intervenes” and drugs are produced in larger quantities; it would be safe to say that America depends upon drugs for cash flow.

Since the U.S. has been in Afghanistan, the supply of heroin into the U.S. has increased from 7% to 60%. The U.S. policy of “supply side” strategies to reduce drugs is a miserable failure. And China is historically aware of western manipulation of facts about drugs, and drug statistics as well.

US policy it is designed to be so, because it justifies inflated police budgets here at home, and creates the illusion that there is a “criminal class” of our citizens, rather than socially marginalized people who have been brutalized into submission or otherwise set-up for failure by police power. Drugs and other government sponsored addictive substances and materials are the fault of the addict, rather than the fault of a social system that relies upon using drugs as a matter of leveraging foreign governments–like China.

Yet far worse than the police themselves are those who cloister themselves away and concoct schemes of social control that are often negotiated, arbitrary by their very nature, blind eyed when it comes to policing the police, and short sighted when it comes to fair or equal justice when it comes to weighing police misconduct against dissent and dissenters that challenge such conduct.

Our Supreme Court supremely and routinely upholds only the interests of that police power, and its subscribers in middle and upper classes. The deck is stacked with paid off Bush family dynasty, paycheck earning, citizens’ rights hating, business and connection loving conservatives like Samuel Alito, John Roberts, and Antonin Scalia-some of the most repressive jurists to ever sit the bench. They are the upholders of all things religious and fanatical; white men who believe that women are primarily birth canals who should stay at home.

Then there are the second string players, justices who are the future liberty oppressors, or in the very least, a silenced liberal impulse, and relics from a brief era of social justice in the 1960’s. Many of them are also Reagan era or Bush dynasty appointees who wear the face of what appear to be “minority” justices, but who are at heart angry and frustrated modern Sambo’s fearfully ready, willing, and abl

e to overlook the majority of issues that affect the poor and the disenfranchised of our America, while extending their hand to the rest of the world—as long as that emergent world is one that has a dollar bill in its hand..

These justices are willing to re-tool a fascist leaning country, and uphold police shenanigans, as long as their cherished “represented” and favored minority wins ( minority as defined by a standard that is over 230 years

old, and outdated for modern representation).

Weakened Justices like iron Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, ballsy Steven Breyer, sometimes bold, but often mediocre Anthony Kennedy; and the new faces of the police state, Sonya Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan are remarkably weak and silent in the face of some of Americas worst repression ever.

They are too busy marveling at the architectures of the modern police state they have helped create by buying into fear campaigns that made a mess with human rights issues here at home, and they upheld the torture of non-Americans; the false election of Bush.

Then there’s Clarence Thomas. What can one say about a black man that hates black men? American language doesn’t have a word for that, but he has been part of some of the most black-people-hating decisions to ever come before the court, and perhaps the only justice who should wear a white robe–if he didn’t seem to hate ALL men.

So, if there is a threat to China, it isn’t liberalizing its society: it could well be U.S. citizens reg

aining the rights we have lost for the last thirty years, or men who have been

systematically miscategorized as “violent offenders,” many of whom are victims themselves. But have no fear China; American is open for your business: American civil rights are in a shambles, while police and military power are a growing threat—but not to Chinese or other foreigners.

Our power structure relies primarily on locking dissenters away from the public discourse, just like we say you do, and our police are very busy setting citizens up and labeling them criminals of one kind or another, at the expense of the real story of America leaking out.

Meanwhile the real crooks are those who wear uniforms, the black robes, the one guy in the white robe, and the

people who pay their salaries. They just took away one of the most cherished of human rights, which was our right to be protected in our homes against police intrusions without a warrant.

Historically that is something that “repressive countries” do to their citizens. they are always more than willing to steer you into the arms of their cronies, rather than into the discourse of the real America—the long term money.

Most importantly, they are for sale, too, despite this recent breath of justice leaking out, and you can get in on it once you recognize who they are, and what they sell.

[ Note: the author does not condone the sterile and distancing use of the word “foreigners,” as applies to new arrivals in America; however, recognizes its utility to American society which relies on racist, sexist, and other-ist language to create in-groups and out-groups; and as a tool to cause new citizen arrivals a modicum of fear, and the forced recognition of a heirarchical template that puts people from other nations at the bottom of any social ladder]


American police censor, manipulate Americas internet

In Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police destroy and createevidence, Police Personality, Supreme Court complicit with police power on May 20, 2011 at 12:38 am
CIA Special Activities Division "Afghanis...

Image by Jamiecat * via Flickr

..and worse, they may be planting what could be called “evidence” on your computer as well. They have the means, the motive,and the technology.

Yesterday, as i wrote, my internet connection, and the act of “thinking and writing” was hijacked, and replaced; rerouted, and redirected, while I was in the middle of the writing

Sadly, the IP trail points to the possibility that the United States government had something to do with it.

It is by now a well known fact that as the United States of America censors the internet. As the U.S. decries abuses of power and instances of internet censorship or close control by cloistered middle-eastern governments like Iran, and inserts itself into every argument that Google has with the Chinese, we have allowed the same thing to happen here.

Equally challenging, if not outright dangerous, is that we have allowed our Nation’s military and spy powers to listen in on our phone conversations, and our internet connections.

The government, in making or  manufacturing a case against a citizen, they can now listen to that citizen discuss the case with a lawyer, and by listening in, the government can pre-empt the citizen’s case strategy, circumventing justice by strategizing against the right of unreasonable search and seizure of one’s protected conversation.

Or, they can monitor your internet connection, and based solely on your website visits, develop an FBI profile of you that you would never know about until it was too late. That type of profiling has already taken place,  and it is against the citizen’s right of due process of the law.

“Instead of recording only what a particular suspect is doing, agents conducting investigations appear to be assembling the activities of thousands of Internet users at a time into massive databases, according to current and former officials. That database can subsequently be queried for names, e-mail addresses or keywords.”

“What they’re doing is even worse than Carnivore,” said Kevin Bankston, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation Carnivore was another program that they used to spy on citizens even before 9/11.  (For the paranoid out there, you can get a glimpse of exactly what they might be sending in and out of your computer using a tool called a “packet-sniffer”. Here is a free one  )

But the worst of all might be happening right now, and you won’t know about it until you get the “knock at your door.”

Police rarely spy on their own kind, and when they do it is almost accidental, and kind of comical.  But they routinely spy on us, and the foot soldier beat cops plant evidence all the time.{ here, herehere, here,  and endlessly, everywhere you look)

While citizens of other nations like Turkey take a stand against such internet censorship,  and China debates how to deal with the issue of western propaganda ( UFO’s, and God,endless global war,  and magic–all that crap that is ruining the minds of American children)and how to stop it from leaking into the minds of its children, our government engages in cyber-warfare, and that warfare has spilled over to its own citizens.

When the White House web page was hacked,our government blamed China, when in fact it was likely just a bunch of Chinese kids – really smart kids–but the attack was not tied to Chinas government. It was a prank.

The CIA—who has been warning us about how evil the Chinese are for over 50 years– ran with it, and accused the Chinese of engineering attacks. A lie of course (and who can beat the CIA at that?). But it was enough of a lie that the average U.S. citizen had one more reason to shake a fist at the east, rather than looking inward at its governments lies.

So, when our government, who has only and indisputably taken a path to eradicate the rights that we hold dear, rights like freedom of speech and press ( which relate directly to internet use), freedom against warrantless searches, and freedom to merely “pursue happiness,” we can only infer darker objectives than the protection of those freedoms, and infer it twice if, when on the internet, we are hijacked for reading alternative news, or material that represents another perspective other than the growing neo-fascist  American mindset.

The United States had long accused communist nations, and Islamic nations, and socialist nations of depriving citizens of freedoms, as well as creating phony legal cases against its citizens in order to smash dissent; but when our nation stepped onto the slippery slope of spying against our own, and repression, all bets were off.

Our nation is now responsible for imprisoning and torturing American citizens, killing citizens of other nations without due process, and war crimes against citizens of other nations.

How often do we hear some entitled idiot say “I don’t care if they spy on my phone or my internets, I ain’t doin’ nothin’ wrong.”?

What about every time your phone or connection is hijacked by some pop-up, or virus? Did it ever occur to you, as you look at Al Jazeera for the latest news in Iraq, or Afghanistan , that your pop-up might actually be leaving a cyber-trail to places you did not want to go?

Did it occur to you that just because you read Al Jazeera, that some pimple faced, X-box playing IT-trained soldier could be sitting in the Phillipines, or Iraq and actually leading you through some experiment ordered by his superiors? Because your ‘profile’—after all , terrorists read Al Jazeera—fits the type; that he or she might be reading along with you?

What if he/she decides to throw you a pop-up, or a re-direct, so they can follow your behavior, and add to your profile? Another mindless cog in a world-wide wheel has the power to reroute your actual browser requests, and replace them with wheel-cog grease.

And what if they throw you something worse, which sits in a folder in your system until you have been determined to be either a “good guy“, or a “bad guy“? Then, what happens when you give that computer to grandma?

Do you gamble online? Every time your redirected offshore, it could be to a U.S. government data base, and it could be leaving traces of things behind; it could even be opening a “back door” and mining your personal photos, or mindlessly routing other traffic through you.

How about porn? Sure, it’s legal, and quite free—but did you ever notice what the pop-us and redirects leave behind? Probably not, but they did make a mess, and that mess can be a useful tool to gain your compliance somewhere in the future. And the data left behind, especially if it made it into your “profile,” might say nothing about you at all, but to them? Well, you might one day NOT run for president…

The fact that you don’t care, or allow them to spy on your connection means you also allow them to do that to others as well. In order for them to spy on an individual, they assemble hundreds of thousands of cyber-profiles gleaned from routers and switches that connect with hundreds of thousands of other peoples connections.

Your mother; your grandmother; dear old dad, and the grand kids. All the data goes into a database, and then that base is routinely referenced and cross referenced for keywords and e-mail addresses. Referenced FOREVER. Worse, every couple of years, some pimple faced IT kid in some branch of our military or police structure gets to look at it.

How do your tax returns look? Remember that charitable donation to your Uncle Sal—the one he bought the boat with? How will it compare to others in 10 years? It is all of the power of the IRS, but flagged, or red flagged, and amplified by infinity. How about your kid’s baby pictures?

And what if at some point those smart Chinese kid hackers grow up and gain your data? Personally, I could trust them with it: it’s the Russian Mob, the Nigerian 419’er, and the FBI that I don’t—they have all shown themselves more than willing to break fundamental laws to gain their purposes.  Only the latter has consistently shown a disdain for Civil Rights, and the law itself[  here, and here, here– well you get the idea.] and more than once is federal police power unaccountable for its law breaking scandals [ here, here, here ], but worst of all: you have nothing to say about it.

Why? because the internet is forever. Privacy? Not for long with you around.

It is the social equivalent of you believing that because you keep your curtains open, anyone who prefers privacy must have something to hide; and the social equivalent of you believing that you have a right to peak into someone else’s curtains.

You don’t, it’s against the law, and your belief might one day backfire, because you never know who else is on those same routers, and those same switches —and you definitely don’t know ‘who knows who’, until you wake up with an enemy you never knew you had—right here at home, in the good ol’ USA.

So what does that make you, with your belief in rights to look into someone else’s curtains? And what will stop them from planting evidence on your computer? Your continued silence about our nation’s censorship and other abuses is your guarantee? What’s your mothers, or fathers, or kids, or neighbors privacy guarantee?

It certainly isn’t you. You are the broken link in the security chain.

Cops are rapists.

In Freud and the Police, Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police destroy and createevidence, Police Personality, Uncategorized on May 18, 2011 at 8:54 pm

…and rape ideology is a powerful tool of social control that can backfire–even on cops.

two likely rapists: cops

New York Police Officers Franklin Mata and Kenneth Moreno, likely rapists

You might have missed this story about some  rapist cops in New York, Franklin Mata and Kenneth Moreno,  while you were following this story, about IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who sits in jail at Rikers Island, likely falsely accused of rape by a woman, a hotel maid who has might have  AIDS. Never mind what kind of character is a woman who contracts AIDS; never mind the debate about power and oppression, and women doing what women have always done to make a side dollar–from selling sex, to blackmail; the hard fact is that it looks like a CIA set-up. Or a right-wing French police set-up in full collusion with American police.

The anatomy of a honey-pot set-up, 101

a) create a victim through indoctrination b) plant female victim in proper location ( in this case the Sofitel) c) wait for the right ‘client’ to show up  d) go to the press before it goes to trial ( in this case, DSK is being tried in the American press; his “victim’s” lawyer, a personal injury lawyer, has virtually told her whole side of the story in the media, yet we do not have a right to know her name?)  e) immediately believe the  female victim, and label the male a perpetrator and f)  use full police powers of evidence manipulation and to seal the deal against a guy before he even gets bailed out–especially, hide, or otherwise overlook exculpatory evidence that could prove a man innocent before a trial is even needed.

In the case of Strauss-Kahn, he even predicted that his opponents would try to set him up on a rape charge weeks before he came to New York.  CNN reports that “Three weeks ago — well before his visit to the New York Sofitel –Strauss-Kahn, who had been considered a leading contender for the French presidential elections next year, discussed the possibility of a woman falsely claiming he attacked her.

In an interview April 28 with the French daily newspaper Liberation, he imagined “a woman who would be raped in a parking lot and who would then be promised 500,000 or a million euros to invent such a story,” the paper reported in an article published Monday, two days after the alleged attempted rape..

So, the “you might have missed it story is the fact that police are being tried as rapists in a rare moment when the police might actually have policed themselves. Well, not the police, directly. The District Attorney is prosecuting the case, so it might be one rare exception to the rule that prosecutors and police are always in collusion together. That’s true 99% of the time, and only when a prosecutor has a slam dunk do they prosecute cops.

Police OfficerKenneth Moreno, 43, is accused of raping the woman, a fashion executive, as his partner, [Officer] Franklin Mata, 29, stood lookout,” and they might have gotten away with it too, except the woman recorded them conspiring. Rape, the rape ideologists tell us, is a crime of power, and who has more social power than police?

The victim in this case might have turned the tables with her recording. Tape recorders are powerful tools of self defense against police brutality.

“The two were arrested in April 2009 after the victim, using a watch equipped with a microphone, covertly taped a conversation with Moreno in which he said he wore a condom.”

Worse, the cops claimed the woman was too drunk to know what hit her, but once again, her case might be aided by the fact that there is a recorded video and “outdoor surveillance camera footage of the victim entering the apartment building on the night of the incident shows she was more sober than prosecutors allege.”

The jury is out deliberating, but it is rare to see cops prosecuted for their misconduct.  Even more rare that a rape claim is substantiated,much less against a cop,  but in this case, it looks like the chicken has come home to roost, because rape ideology is a dangerous tool of police strategy, population control, and overall ideology of social control, and it backfired on them here.

Rape culture is a term used within women’s studies and feminism, describing a culture in which rape and sexual violence against women are common and in which prevalent attitudes, norms, practices, and media condone, normalize, excuse, or tolerate sexual violence against women. Examples of behaviors commonly associated with rape culture include victim blaming and sexual objectification.  Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you notice anything that was left out in that description and definition? No where is there a mention of what women do to children or what women do to men who are under their control. Nowhere is there any statement of the fact that the attitudes, norms, and the practices of our culture, in collusion with the media, and enforced by women who believe in police share any responsiblity for police violence that is directed at men in our society. Violence begets violence.

The one crucial detail that is missing is this: American women uphold, encourage, and instill in their children behaviors that lead to male violence as long as that violence is directed at  males. And nowhere in this discussion is there a glimmering of what women can do to children to instill that violence component. What kind of woman raises a cop? Certainly, a Freudian profile explains it a bit, but what does it take to create a person who by its very nature is the progenitor of violent social control?

Police are the primary entities who are the tools, and bi-products of women who believe in violence. They uphold the flawed logic–the fallacy of the “rape culture,”  which is a narrowly tailored doctrine that feminists and other politically motivated people have suggested is the basis of American society, if not the worlds society as a whole; and therein lies the rub.

Feminists believe that their holes are the object that men desire, and that men, having power, will do anything to maintain that power, or to hold that power over women. There’s part of the problem: have you ever met a feminist? That’s a hole you don’t ever want to fall into…

The flaw in rape culture logic is that women like power too, and use it over men who fall into relationships with them, and these women excercise that power over the possible or eventual children that are bi-products of those hetero-normative relationships.Women are, and always have been, the primary selectors of mates, and create the  biproducts that reflect their values–children who are violent.

Women like failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, helped put the lie of the rape culture into America’s vernacular, and whereas only now are actual rapes being dealt with in places where rape actually take place–like Africa. Women like her also helped put more cops in your homes by stirring up a phantom fear that American women were being raped.

With the mythology of the rape culture, and a  street level indoctrination campaign that maintains women are raped far more frequently than actually happens, your police willingly followed her lead. Why? Because statistic generating public fear campaigns are how police and pundits make their living, and so does your mother.

Why? Because “Yo Mama’s so nasty she joined the four horseman: war, death, famine, disease and Yo mama

Any child of the ghetto culture, and any trailer trash kid [ the primary targets of police violence] can tell you a “yo’ mama” joke, and we could engage in discussions about how those jokes are products of a culture that abuses women, and that these jokes are a symbolic abuse of mothers.

But the reality is, these jokes reflect the common, lived and shared experience of being ‘mothered’ in America. The fact is that this reflection of America is one of the few cracks at the seams of your mamas new jeans, and America condones, accepts, expects, and enforces nasty mothers.

It is primarily women in America who uphold and support the rape culture, because women in America are fully supported–if not outright by government tax dollars and welfare–they are supported by the police structure that inserts itself into the relationships between men and women. And men are often raped, but it is unmanly to talk about it. American women only affirm it.

Forget Betsy Ross, or Martha Washington–our modern nation, America, has found in its women, mothers that are willing allies who create violence prone males and females, and our nation leads the world in undeclared wars, and in deaths caused by invasions of foreign countries.Americas mothers have created children responsible for over one hundred thousand Iraqi’s, another twenty thousand deaths in Afghanistan, and counting in other places around the world. Injuries are upwards of 300, 000.

American mothers excercise power over children, and that power is often abused. It takes a severe form of social dysfunction to allow the creation of murderers.  THis, and the fact that the police power and the social mechanisms that uphold it are responsible for the current over-policing of the poor, and the dissenters, is to a point where American citizens recently, and willingly gave up there Constitutional rights against unlawful search and seizure; against unlawful imprisonment without trial; and rights that protected us against torture.

Since when does yo’ mama need permission to come into your bedroom? Neither do the American  police. We have nothing to say anymore about how the “enemies of America” abuse civil rights.

Yo mama’s so nasty, the US Government uses her bath water for chemical weapons, and when she didn’t find chemical weapons in Iraq’s bedroom , she invaded anyways and said she did find them; You allowed it. To you, the lie is more important–and more potent, than the truth about yo’ mama.

It seems the lies yo’ mama tells are better than the truth, and the biggest lie we tell in America is about yo’ mama’s creation of police who abuse American citizens. Or maybe the bigger lie we tell is that lie of omission: the fact that women’s threats, women’s violence, and coercive conduct and behavior directed at children creates cops, and creates a police state, and those mothers and those cops sanction the unspeakable crime of rape against men.

But the fact is, Dominique Strauss-Kahn predicted the possibility of being set up, and two of New York’s finest are awaiting their guilty verdict–but you never heard about them, because they are rapists and cops, protected by the media, and birthed by American mothers.

If the honey trap is an acceptable tool of social control, we should use it more often–on cops, before we become everything we were taught to abhor about foreign governments.

Here is a Wikipedia link that appears to be straight out of some lower level CIA handbook, a “How To” manual of recruiting women like the un-named  “victim” from Guinea. However despicable rape ideology is as a tool of social control in America, where women can leverage men with false allegations that waste time and resources,  rape ideologies most striking failure is to prevent actual rape from happening; its most striking failure to actually describe the problem is most evident in the Congo today, where upwards of millions of rapes have been taking place over the last several years.

So maybe the solution is that we raise girls who become women who accuse police and soldiers of rape, not to even the score, but to balance a society that only upholds police power, and convicts innocent men before due process has run its course, but also protects the names and faces of women who falsely accuse.

American women face no penalties for false allegations, so maybe it’s time to tilt those allegations at the police. One more lie in the American arsenal of untruth does not make a tool, but rather, it is a hammer hit on our own thumbs.

(Just a side-note: as I wrote this post, I was cyber-attacked or hacked three separate times. In each case, many of the words I had typed were not saved to backup, and many of the links I had used had not been auto-saved. Some of my content was lost. At one point, some kind of attack that used the language “infinite loop” occured, and at another point, Google defaulted only to Arabic. Has this attack happened to you? I am sure it is some SigInt prank, but also likely a clear monitoring of dissent in action. Ask yourself what kind of nation you want; I choose one that is truly free, not one leveraged into oblivion by lies, and police state control. Free speech is next.)