Justice For-All

Posts Tagged ‘Project MKULTRA’

The Mental Rapist; or FBI pre-natal Mind-fucking Primer 101

In Freud and the Police, Its for theChildren, Police abuse women, Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Personality, security theater on July 20, 2011 at 1:33 am
FBI agent in 1939

Who is That Creepy Guy Around the Corner? Photo of FBI Agent in 1939 Image via Wikipedia

The FBI Describes Itself When it Employs Profiles.

Imagine if your daughter stumbled across this headfuck, “The Mental Rapist Enjoys Abusing Women,” an article purportedly transcribed from a conversation that someone had with an FBI agent about “mind-rapists,” which to the best of my knowledge means “head-fuckers.”

And nobody can compete with the big-budget propaganda campaign waged against your kids mind by the FBI with the exception of Hollywood, which is literally in lockstep with FBI propaganda.

The profile of the FBI is as an agency is that it is driven by pathological narcissism, which is a mental disease masquerading as a noble intentioned, but self deluded entity or person[s] *

I don’t know your daughter, but I do care about what you, her father or mother, have to deal with as she evolves into her own person.

And I care twice that your kids mind doesn’t get cluttered too early with police and FBI baggage–mind manipulation,  fear mongering, and propaganda as a tool of distraction away from real issues–like the fact that America is dropping bombs, and depleted uranium all over the middle east.

I mean, sure, the argument could be made that the Middle East isn’t in the FBI jurisdiction on that matter–but that didnt’t stop them from hunting down turr-err-isss’s in Germany, Iraq, Pakistan, et al did it?

And certainly, the companies that are dropping depleted uranium have headquarters in the U.S., right?

But they want to focus–and they want you to focus–on hypothetical threats to your child’s genitalia instead….WTF!!Q?????

Which makes me wonder what kind of people work there? After all we know that the FBI has a long history of pedophiles in the organization.

WE exist these days in conditions where online predators are the police, fetishizing your kids naivete, and more than willing to isolate her and wreak havoc on her conception of the world.

I care even more when I relaize how many FBI agents are women haters, patriarchs, or gender bashing, bitter gay women using their positions of trust and authority to get at, and corrupt your kids head;and sadly, they target, and focus quite heavily on your daughters rather than your sons.

Don’t get me wrong: I am well aware of how your sons are abused by society, because two boys are murdered in America for every girl killed , and how little attention young boys get when it comes to discussions about ‘protecting children’.

By the time your son reached puberty, he has likely survived a public shcool counselors recomendation that he take Ritalin or some other drug, a coaches recommendation that he “man up,” or in the very least, someform of ostracization because he resists male sexual programming. He has also survived numerous mental and physical assaults aginst his masculine traits by female schoolmates–by ten years of age. I understand that well.

But this post is about your child, and particularly your daughter, being safe from online interactions with police, and FBI agents who CRAWL THE INTERNET LOOKING FOR VULNERABLE, LONELY KIDS TO TALK TO.

And kids are smarter than we give them credit for, and any teen girl out there could stumble upon this post as I did. It is a blog post from awhile ago that got me thinking of the nefarious nature of police propaganda aimed at your daughter, online.

I couldn’t write better propaganda designed to attach itself to your young daughters mind if I were a pedophile gym teacher–it hits the center of isolation in the mind of any girl who feels she has failed at a relationship, been used by a boy, or risked her virginity in a juvenile attempt at love.

It is allegedly a mental profile of a “mental rapist” whyo uses the internet to “rape the mind”, and it’s full of all the right kind of weirdness that could help a girl identify what she feels is an even weirder young boy who hurt her feelings.

But what bothers me th emost, is that some FBI agent actually has the time to write such pap–and target it at a vulnerable woman, or girl. If that agent targets vulnerable women, what might they say to your daughter?

And all that language about “him” does not at all reassure me it isn’t a female agent impersonating a male, and describing herself–after all, the internet is full of weirdos, just looking to profile–or indoctrinate– your kids.

I won’t weigh in to the implications that this could be a fantasy of the blogger, or the entrapment of the bloggers mind, but it is what it is: a conversation between a vulnerable woman and a purported FBI agent.

Police play on fear all the time, and it’s socially destructive, creepy, and very, very police psychology oriented. Almost as if they are telling us what lurks in their minds, not in ours.

And worse, they now have access to your kids online.

* The police and FBI profile is one that includes narcisisstic psychopathology http://www.slideshare.net/samvaknin/narcissistic-and-psychopathic-leaders, particularly marked by unhealthy confabulation, meaning narcissists believe they are better than everyone else, smarter than everyone else, etc. because they are the good guys and gals, while forgetting the egregious, historic, criminal violations of US law that are part of their organizational structure.

Rethinking Officer Friendly, redefining bad touch.

In Freud and the Police, Police Personality, security theater on July 20, 2011 at 12:39 am


What if it was your daughter!!??!!

They always say that, don’t they? That meme is a tool of fear-mongering, designed to re-focus you on a strange, un-named threats, instead of the threat in front of you–someone who employs such ideology. That ideology is pathological narcissism.* And they hurt individuals with their self-centered manipulative perspectives.

And they are destroying the health of American society, while claiming to improve it.

The FBI, and cops, protecting your daughters mind, so you don’t have to!

They want you to fear terrorists with strap on bombs, rapists jerking off around every corner– and the dreaded pedophile lurking on the internet. But the truth is, more kids die at the hands of their mothers  than by strange men lurking on the internet.
But whatever you do–don’t  go near the head fucker!

The truth is—and has ALWAYS been–that children are more likely to be killed by American bombs and unexploded ordinance or depleted uranium [ here  , and also here ] or by female caregivers and babysitters right here in America, the they will ever face from strangers, men, kidnappers, or pedophiles.

Yet the cops make their money by keeping you in fear of strangers. But what is more strange than the mind of a cop? I mean, cops are  stepping up their use of Tasers on children [and here, and elsewhere]!

WAKE UP, peeple. This behavior is emblematic of an institutional psychology disorder.

Whereas it may be true that some pedophile is just waiting for a snapshot from of your kids Barbie Camera while he or she is riding a vibrating Harry Potter broom, it should scare us that he FBI is the agency that raised such an alarm.

I mean, what is in their minds to even imagine such things–what kind of mind could imagine such things–much less project them upon the world?

Oh, I know: the same great minds that brought you the overly broad US Patriot Act, and the TSA feeling up your six year old.

So, we all need a distraction away from the fact that the FBI routinely lies in warrant applications against internet providers, and that they also have virtually destroyed the fourth amendment with DPI technology–the same software that Iran and China use to stifle dissent is used by the FBI and InfraGard snitches.

I say it takes one to know one, as the old saw goes.The question we need to ask is what really endangers your kid online, beside the fact that the FBI can and stores images of your kids in their massive child porn collection?

What is more scary than knowing your government distributes child porn, instead of destroying it? I would suggest that your child’s memory of being trained to accept the hands of officer friendly down her pants might be a step in the ‘further’ direction of corrupting your kid with police state psychopathology.

They are tyeaching this girl to believe thatsuch physical contact is actually “good touch,” when in fact history shows us otherwise.

Sure, a picture may be worth a thousand words, but the infiltration of a child’s mind by police fear-mongering and mind abuse last generations. And it starts with the kind of contact you see in the video.

And there are worse things for your kid to face, I promise you; I mean, after all, that one in 1.5 million chance of someone creepy encountering her or him.

But the daily indoctrination to trust authority–not least of which is training young girls to be felt up by people in authority—is historically, by very freekin far, a worse option, with actual dire consequences.

* The police and FBI profile is one that includes narcisisstic psychopathology http://www.slideshare.net/samvaknin/narcissistic-and-psychopathic-leaders, particularly marked by unhealthy confabulation, meaning narcissists believe they are better than everyone else, smarter than everyone else, etc. because they are the good guys and gals, while forgetting the egregious, historic, criminal violations of US law that are part of their organizational structure.

About bad writing, and cyber war waged against citizens: prior restraint has a new meaning.

In Uncategorized on July 9, 2011 at 1:47 am

Apologies to the two or three of my readers who don’t work for some U.S. Intelligence agency:  It’s not easy being Green, because all the people and all the agencies that wage war against us can really fuck up your day, and make life difficult–but not impossible–for us.

Sometimes I feel like a little pig myself, shouting into a big hole full of cute, captive animals.

 

And they certainly can alter the quality,and delivery of content as I try to publish over the web–a sort of preemptive prior restraint that it seems, might have to get tested in court. Maybe if I just sold shit, and click-linked every word to something worth money, I would have an easier time publishing.

But I don’t market products, I offer ideas, not even products I used to believe in, like  Winnie the Pooh–coming to theaters near you on July 15th!

I now have to use a packet sniffer,and I keep logs of intrusion attempts,  and at times, because I am tired of my writing being worked over. I have to use anonymizing software to merely get my words published, and by that time, I have often been under cyber attack by some fat faced tax dollar funded American cop or other pork slurper, or a circle jerk full of  military or para-military douchebags at one of the many cyber war waging facilities in America, and offshore, where America lobs cyber bombs at itself, and blames others to raise cyber war awareness.

My links get lost, or re-linked, my finally published content drops a verb or a noun here or there, sentences get broken up, and the final, altered product looks like gibberish, and makes me look like a complete idiot. Which, obviously,  I kind of am sometimes.

For all of them, let me make it clear: if America were invaded by an enemy other than  Americans who are like you, I would swing the American door wide open, and walk that enemy up to your daughters playhouse at high tea, while your husband or wife is discussing Winnie the Pooh,  and sell all of you as an informants for the cause against you, and anyone else who subverts Constitutional rights that I hold dear, and that you toy with.

Does that make it clear where I stand, against you?

But for the two or three human beings left out there who actually read this blog, I want you to know that I would put my life in front of a cannon to protect your kids, and, metaphorically, have done as much my whole life, walkig the line between free speech, and oppression of that speech.

So to those two or three actual readers (you know who you are) I apologize that a lot of what I write looks like crap once it is written–every time I work around one of their hacks, it seems the local ISP’s step in and in InfraGard fashion —  even the Catholics are pissed about that private sector untrained spying–, subvert the fourth amendment, and obliterate any semblance of the enshrined concept of prior restraint against publishing.

Sometimes, it takes me up to a couple of hours to publish a story because of how many intrusions they attempt while I publish; other times, I get the dreaded error that the ISP did not renew my address on the network.

And I take full blame for that–after all, if I wrote positive things about the collusion and co-option of feminism by the CIA, I probably wouldn’t get hacked as much as I do. If I believed that the DEA, ICE, FBI-CIA, NSA, et al were actually the good guys, I probably wouldn’t have to cut my internet connection every time some spook decided to re-direct my web searches to g-d knows where.

If  I am seeking a link about the failed drug war in Mexico, the CIA raping boys in Iraq,  Americas use of children as sex slaves, or especially for some odd reason, Rusty E. Nelson, I have been taken to places I never wanted to go–and believe me, I didn’t want to know what America is doing to foreign children, or how the DEA-FBI-ATF drug trade really works in Mexico.

If I wrote that Police Officer Smiley really wanted to give your kid a candy-sucker, or a chocolate banana, with no deeper, or creepy metaphorical intention than that  I would probably not get my internet connection cut or dropped by the local ISP as often as I do.
And maybe, if I believed, as most allegedly left leaning, or social justice minded people do, that false rape allegations are a necessary tool in the war against oppression, and barely exist, and just shut up about it, I would even have more readers–not that I need them, because this blog is 99% NOT ad supported, other than that WordPress.com offers one of simplest, and coolest blogging platforms out there, with e-blogger running a close second.( That’s the entirety of my commercial message).

But they’re  not right, oppression of one leads to oppression of all–have you ever noticed that it is left leaning, socialist, democratic, or other progressive men that get set up in false rape allegations? Cops win, every time a woman falsely accuses a man of rape, and ordinary wome lose when they buy into mass-market feminism.

But often when I publish, these things happen: my internet connection suddenly times out when I publish, after hours of problem-free surfing; my internet connection suddenly freezes up; I get a suden flashingscreen and cannot publish ( a DOS attack); the local ISP “we can’t find what you are looking for” page, especially from Qwest Communications, which is so obviously a tool of the FBI and Infragard.

This is what I get for speakin' me mind.

So, again, I apologize for the inconvenience of having to read me. I am working on ways to subvert their subversion of my writing, starting by pre-writing everything offline.

In the meantime, do you think, or write about things that are not in line with the American war machine and its allies, like depleted uranium used on children in Iraq and elsewhere  , or the CIA manufacturing of consensus in America despite an explicit reference in the CIA charter  that says that they cannot operate in a domestic capacity? Or how the FBI is in collusion with international cabals and local feminists to stifle dissent?

I do write about those things, and I drag up the ghosts of Americas past, like the rapes of women in the Viet Nam war, and I like doing it. It makes me feel like life is worth living, because otherwise, dissent gets crumpled under their official version of events, despite their illegal and often unethical motivations, as they wage war against reason, against truth, and against justice.

And they wage war against the future generations of children that could be born outside of their man-sweeping, bomb dropping, woman killing, child murdering, child raping perpsective of reality.

But if you write like I do, just so that there is a voice against these monsters, here are a few tools you can use to protect yourself against police intrusions into you computer, or to monitor them once they are there. And always, always keep log files, and back those files up above everything. You never know when they will come in handy–so use anonymous e-mail resenders, and send backups everywhere you can.

Michele Bachmann for President ? Michele loves the children way too much

In CIA anf Feminism, Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Rape Culture, security theater on June 23, 2011 at 12:28 am

Maybe my internet connection is slow, or maybe it’s not. Maybe the search terms Michele Bachmann and “child prostitution in Minnesota” are on the FBI radar.

Either way, when I tried to access the documentation of the Republican involvement in the pedophilia and prostitution scandals that had occured under Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and George Bush Jr.-newspaper scans and clippings, police reports, trials and judicial investigations- my web search was redirected and the connection timed out.

Seven times.

REPUBLICANS LOVE LITTLE CHILDREN, SOMETIMES TO DEATH: THE FRANKLIN CHILD SEX RING AND THE BUSH ERA WHITE HOUSE ( a formerly banned Discovery Channel documentary-59 minutes long)

I was curious if the recent announcement of Michele Bachmann running for president scared anyone except me, because, after all, she has a main pipeline hook-up to children in Minnesota foster care, and has made money by taking in many of them, and Minnesota has a curious reputation for producing child prostitutes culled from low income families and foster care.

I was also wondering about the fact that over the years, many American children involved in the foster care system have been molested, sexually abused, used, while IN that system, or otherwise harmed, scapegoated,and misdirected through life after contact with foster parents, while many others–especially the males– wound up in prison,discredited, or dead.

Like many Republicans before her, Michelle Bachmann just loves the foster care kiddies. 

I was especially curious, because many many years ago, during the Reagan years, other Republicans were implicated in child sex abuse claims that rocked the nation, but these children’s stories were eventually swept under the proverbial prayer shawl when names were being named, and fall guys being felled.

The kids claimed they were mind controlled, and attendance and victimization at shadowy cross country sex parties of Republican operatives and politicians. Some passed lie detector tests and said that George H.W. Bush himself made appearances at those parties, or drew maps of the inside of the White House that no kid could know unless they had been there.

One Paul Bonacci collected a million dollar judgement against some of his perpetrators many years after the FBI sought to discredit him (largely because he was a male accuser, rather than a female), and instigated him being locked up for five years on perjury charges, and a judge brushed his story under the rug, while some of the other victims themselves were sentenced to prison because the judge called them liars and perjurers.

Then I watched, as “first wave feminism” cozied up ever closer to right wing police ideology; and colluded with national media and national police organizations to proselytize rape theology–a cultish socio-political climate and method of social blackmail, and control where adherents viciously attack non-believers, and ruthlessly prey on non conformist males like Julian Assange.

If feminists were anything but a CIA backed movement, they would question Bachmann’s child rearing experience, or Mitt Romney’s for that matter.

Listened as uber-manly John Walsh convinced us that child predators were everywhere, cooperation with police is necessary at all times, because he had lost his son to someone; and observed how the Nation built forward into a perspective where a military draft was no longer necessary; as American boys and girls were desensitized, and militarized through Ritalin, video games, and fear of consensual sex. Fearful enough to sign chastity vows, yet sign up for war, and get their hands on guns and go over seas to kill other [married] peoples children.

 All this as American prisons–rape factories, really– doubled and then over-crowded their capacity to house Americas men–sons, husbands, fathers-of-children-men, and multiplied charges that could be brought against men, as if American men were actually the problem.`

And I absorbed how women were to be believed no matter what, even when they were clearly violence prone and proven liars.

Try as one can, it is almost impossible to avoid the idea of conspiracy theory, but my internet connection was cut seven times when I began to look for the old newspaper cyber-clippings and the names of the victims of these earlier cases of horrendous child abuse that preceded–and in some ways created, the rape-culture politics of the last two decades.

The very phrase conspiracy evokes an instant and undesirable reaction in most listeners, and an even quicker dismissal of the speaker as dubiously motivated or uninformed at best, and then dismissed with real evidence of crime minimized as merely part of a “Conspiratainment Complex”.

As one commentator puts it, “Conspiracy Theory lacks credibility because it has no history. Original research doesn’t get cited so much as looted, refitted as filler content to feed new revelations to a hungry audience. They know what they like because they like what they know. It is a product that gets updated for new audiences through a self-selected succession of upstart entrepreneurs. Mae Brussel becomes Lyndon LaRouche becomes Alex Jones…”

Yet conspiracy–or in the very least, distrust of official sources and inferences drawn in lieu of honesty from such sources– is beginning to define modern relations between American citizens and the press, the government, the police, and especially ‘citizen journalists. We doubt even our neighbors over the back fence, as we become a nation that routinely and daily marches over international treaties, the Geneva conventions, and UN charters in what appears to be a desperate attempt to control the outcomes of the world–for the next thousand years.

And we do it without questioning the perpetrators: our tacit, complicit selves; our neighbors, OUR police, and OUR government.

We are numbed to human rights abuses in America because we are afraid to speak about the abuses of our nation of excess, and those abuses are egregious, yet unspeakable, because many fear that we could become the next one in line for abuse. We all look at the man on the whipping post and secretly say ” glad it ain’t me,” or ” you probably did something to deserve it,” rather than to speak against the inhumanity.

Who cares if the last decades of presidents ruled by secret Executive Orders, and Obama is no different? ‘Its cheaper to run the paper pushing govermint that way, right? That guy getting his ass handed to him by cops on that Youtube video? He shoulda’ kept his mouth shut, and ain’t that funny how the cop rams the guys head into the squad car door? Haw, Haw, Haw…’

Glad it ain’t me…

So if you do decide to look into issues for yourself–or in the parlance of a bygone era, to employ freethinking–you are likely to encounter doubtful, unbelievable information all along the way, with a host and smattering of divisive partisan and anti-partisan rhetoric and lots of factoids that mainstream media manufactures,yet refuses to validate–hell, we’re still waiting to see the John F. Kennedy files!

Oh, and lots of cute rescued puppy stories .

But you won’t always have your internet connection cut off, redirected,or otherwise impeded until you look into what are, apparently, all the right places for all the right data with all the right Agency names, stories like “child prostitution pipeline in Minnesota,” for instance.

The problem isn’t the information, but its sources in government and the FBI et al, and worse, the glut of ‘safe’ and ‘sanctioned’ media is all just propaganda in favor of American consumer capitalism, and designed to numb your mind out of the idea of asking important questions–did Hunter S. Thompson actually commit suicide or was he suicided?

What really matters, then is ‘What’s your flavor?’ ESPN and the latest b.s. scandal about some pumped-up athlete on steroids? Or CSI: Miami, and its brand of power and control police-porn and escapism?

What (gasp!) yet another hither-come-yon 16-year-old maiden that was trained by Disney Corp. to be a ‘child superstar’ only to later cram her butt cheeks onto a stripper pole, and get all of us talking? How do you think she got the job as a child star for Disney execs in the first place?

The modern media cranks out one of those stories every couple of years, tropes and parodies of real news; real humdingers to slather over, but crummy stories to read. From a money standpoint, imaginative as your entertainment dollar is old–but how trite, and uncreative; how easy to access and control such stories; how easy to talk about.

Which makes them non-stories. Infotainment for couch-sitting numb-asses stuck in the Conspiratainment Complex, trying to shoot their way to the next level of Law and Order SVU over a box of Oreos.

But real stories are always there,and they boil and simmer, and waft real flavor, and spice. They take time to cook, and for some ingredients to settle to the bottom, while others bubble up to the top. Real stories take time to read, and research, and to finally tell you by their scent that the time is ripe to tell them–even the left-overs are savory.

I know that I haven’t found real information UNTIL the internet connection goes wacky.

Obama’s latest lockstep-with-Bush maneuver? Boring, and besides he’s doing his best, and gee whizz he sure talks nice for a…um, lawyer.

The CIA stirring up endless war in the middle east? More drones, droning? What’s new? That old story is too difficult for most of us to understand, or care about, and besides, ‘those people are always killing eachother over there anyways’– until it was us over there killing those people–but for freedom–and National Security reasons; like, dude, cool warporn videos of real life videogame killers, conquering heroes.

Who cares if the CIA is exporting child slavery? They moved the Finders cult to Taiwan?

Who cares…

WE TRUST GOVERNMENT; WE LIKE OUR JOBS ( those of us who have them still); AND WE DON’T CARE WHAT HAPPENS OUT THERE, AS LONG AS MY TAXES DON’T GO UP…and cops keep those crack-heads and sex offenders out of my neighborhood.

And, hey if I want real interesting stories about real stuff, I will listen to John Grishham on audio mp3 ; the latest on how Harry Potter comes out of the closet riding a vibrating broom that his mother bought him, in a touching moment.

But Jeff Gannon? Who is he and who cares anymore?
That story is so, um, 2008, and John Stewart covered that. And don’t even tell me about Guantanamo anymore, at least it isn’t Abu Ghraib. And besides, who cares?

Oh, wait: SlutWalk is big news, right now, something to talk about, and it helps women, right?

Its the moment we live in that counts–so never mind that the same police agency in Toronto Canada that made a ‘bad remark about women dressing provocatively’ also broke Dorian Bartons arm at the G20 and tried to cover-up his false arrest and physical damages by hiding the police officer responsible for it!

What matters is that SlutWalkers with imaginary rapes in their heads distract us away from stories of recent and actual victims of police violence, and whether or not feminism is intact, and women controlled through fear.

It’s not easy to research the fringes of boring old history, nor is it easy to recover histories truly defining and important lost moments; but if we cared about anything, we should care about how hooked up Michelle Bachmann is with Minnesota foster children–we should be very scared, because back there in the not too far away past is the Franklin Credit Union scandal, the CIA child cult the Finders and the many moments that followed.

Republicans, the CIA, the FBI and foster care kids have a cozy little history worth noting. As Bachmann puts it, kids have value: “Our children are worth it and obedience to God demands it.”

That not-too-far-away past was just enough time to raise Generation Single mother/Split-family household– soldiers and cannon fodder for the IED laden roads of Iraq. No room for men–or fathers- in the houses of lower income families, when fear-trained women are raising future soldiers on a steady diet of war-porn, video games, hatred for men, and Ritalin–and we talk about a technology gap, while importing tech savvy workers from India, and China?

Another  moment from the past not quite lost, is the not long ago actual news of the Finders pedophilia and child sex cult; a group of people who were part of a major international child sex and pornography ring, a criminal case of child neglect, abuse, and cult-sex effectively buried the FBI.

Those moments are not entirely lost, nor are those moments or the significance of those moments forgotten. Sometimes they just move them overseas. Those moments pertain to now, as society acts out an orchestrated response to imagined rape, while vilifying men who work for peace.

What is missing though, is a plausible explanation of why the FBI did virtually nothing about allegations of children being sexually abused, shuffled across Americas borders in vans, pimped to political organizations and some of them eventually committing suicide, and being murdered on their watch.

What is missing is an explanation from the FBI of why it allowed the child victims of that eras scandals to be prosecuted for perjury after those victims spoke out at trials and at judicial inquiries. Or why the FBI let the CIA cover-up that “internal matter”  of the Finders child porn and sex cult. After all, the CIA charter does not allow them to do their dirt here on American shores–right?

Which would have implicated the FBI for not prosecuting criminals within the CIA. And it implicates them now in orchestrating and socially engineering a climate of false flag waving about child sex rings and porn.

Why now the FBI is grandstanding and attempting moral high ground in their claims to be pursuing child sex rings, pornography, and international human trafficking, and pulling up only handfuls of alleged pedophiles–bored porn collectors really–and that same agency has no definition of how women can rape kids; no clear profiles, or policies in place that take action against women who procure children for prostitution.

Women have primary, fundamental and fundamentalist access to childrens minds, and if mind control begins anywhere, it begins there.

The FBI are apparently too busy pre-emptively setting up phony child porn links to get to the heart of the matter: women who control children. They are an agency that neither seeks out, nor prosecutes the perpetrators, or the procurers–and only make a show of prosecuting the bottom feeders, instead of going after sharks.

The now widely debunked Jordan Minnesota child sex scandal, the McMartin preschool scandal, the so-called satanic sex abuse cults of the rural Americans; these were easy targets for the FBI, because they helped create them–and even then, they were proven to be part of a bizarre contrived witch hunt; but Franklin, and the Finders?

Yet again, the powerful were able to get away, likely literally, with murder, and the FBI did nothing to stop it, even with the clear and convincing evidence that it WAS real–before the actual investigations.Such an agency has no moral high ground to stand on.

Now,  I am not implying that Michelle Bachmann is a pedophile, though she has often declared her longing and love for children, but just like so many other competitive-birther’s and child collecting women on the left like Angelina Jolie and Madonna, her agenda for kids scares me; and I am not suggesting that there is a conspiracy at all, but the fact is, apparently, powerful women just love kids, anf the FBI has no profile of their capabilities.

I am remembering history, and wondering if anyone else is as creeped out as I am when I make the connection between Republicans and their sordid history with children; especially other peoples children, like runaways, and foster kids, and their connections to local charities and social services that give them access to kids.

That double standard that overlooks the female inter-family dynamic that encouraged Sarah Palin’s daughter to get knocked up; and that womans hypocrisy on sex and family values has Minnesota roots.

There’s just something not quite right in Minnesota, and its women are brewing up some interesting stories.

I hope I am wrong, but Michelle Bachmann is the Republican answer to the caustic female Democrats who created a generation of girls who slather over the idea that rape “does happen, might happen, and could happen,” to little girls and women, but forget how many little boys disappear only to become Jeff Gannons who service Karl Rove’s, and how connected they all are with foster kids and runaways.

The FBI still can’t find Jacob Wetterling, nor have they ever prosecuted or publicly addressed the Finders CIA cult. I guess you can’t grease the government propaganda wheels if boys are victims.

I am being open minded, and speculative; pre-emptively cautious.

And, I am wondering why my internet goes down, or redirects, or times out every time I search for topics like Detroit Police Murder 7-year-old girl, Johnny Gosch/Guckert/Gannon, and Rusty E. Nelson, who was arrested two days after Hunter S. Thompson committed suicide–and especially the hard data about Franklin Credit Union.

Standard issue conspiracy phrases like ‘CIA mind control’ don’t miss a cyber-beat because the CIA were outed years ago with MKULTRA and child sex experiments via Project MONARCH-but ‘CIA sex camps in Svay Pek Cambodia’ causes my system to overclock, and I get the special local ISP message page ‘we couldn’t find what you were looking for’–a dare to look harder, but beware of what “YOU” find there, as if its my fault,or my CIA sex camp.

I get lots of bandwidth if I look up Seinfeld quotes, or download commercially sponsored music videos, but there is always that little problem when I look up off color or off-popular-radar government and police or  FBI “counter-terrorism” directed against Americans; like cowardly investigations against peace activists, like Mick Kelly.

Reality check; O.K., ESPN, MSNBC,etc. load just fine despite the heavy ad content and java script clutter; and the pop-ups direct me to the latest athlete who is banging Madonna’s child-collecting wooden box full of Kabbalah charms, and fresh infotainment on Lady GayGay’s meat pie.

Same old drum beat, different day, beating the pale dead horse; and the byte goes on.

The strangest part is that I write using only public internet access, and that is a really big bunch of dots to try to connect right now. But the lines of history are not, and if you like a good story, try starting your own with “history repeats itself,” but stay away from all that conspiracy, and stick to the facts.

All the facts I have to go on is that Michelle Bachmann loves the children, and especially family-detached foster children; and she appears to be the Republican answer to the excesses of Democratic feminist rhetoric, like Hillary Clintons dubious CIA-backed feminist village, or the late Sheila Wellstone’s hyper-focused anti-male excesses in Minnesota and her denial of women’s violence against children.

There is just something wrong, or questions not getting asked about Minnesota women, because they sure do raise a lot of baby hookers.

I wouldn’t want any of those women around my kids–or yours, despite both parties claims to love,and great desires to act upon that love, with, and  “for the children.”

They might just love them to death, especially if the children are boys.

 

 

 

SlutWalk Raises Awareness of the Need for Therapists, not Cops

In CIA anf Feminism, Police abuse women, Police Personality, Rape Culture, security theater on June 20, 2011 at 11:29 pm

enGendering Rape awareness aim of Sunday’s SlutWalk in Seattle

quotes Rapists don’t go for the prettiest or sexiest or the interestingly dressed. They go… Read more

SlutWalk, the social movement sparked by a Toronto policeman’s comment about rape and dressing provocatively* [ emphasis mine], came to Seattle on Sunday afternoon.

A feisty crowd of chanting, sign-waving, selfdescribed “sluts” marched down Pine Street from Capitol Hill’s Cal Anderson Park to Westlake Center — stopping traffic, confounding tourists and drawing an enthusiastic crowd of onlookers.

Seattle’s event is part of an international series of slutwalks, which got their start earlier this year after a Toronto police officer told a group of women that to avoid being the victims of rape or abuse, they should not dress like sluts.

The suggestion that women are to blame for a rape or sexual violence because of the way they dress has inspired activists to organize walks in Toronto, Boston, Dallas and Ottawa, Ontario. On Saturday, about 200 participants marched in the Spokane SlutWalk. Seattle police estimated about 500 participated in Sunday’s event.

[ notice the photog above featured the one “attractive girl”, instead of the great mass of obese women in attendance–how pimping/ lookist is that? But these women are more open to police/social control, because they seek approval]

———————————————————————————————————————————————

* provocatively: to provoke

Slutwalkers Need TheRapists.

I don’t think Slutwalking does a thing for raising awareness about rape or rape culture but it does put female ugliness on display, in more ways than one.

Gone are the days of svelt Playboy bunny and neoCIA agent Gloria Steinem, and in with tattooed manwomen, dorky, cowardly desperate manboys, and the obese–and everyone who agrees with the statement that men deserve what they get if they “provoke” a bully, right?

Wrong. Modern feminists are so estranged from real men that they can only make their appeals to police rape culture, because real men are constantly under violent social pressures of conformity, and isolated from the dialogues.

Don’t think modern feminism is an ugly tool of social control? Take a look yourself at the Seattle Slutwalkers.

As usual, the standard knee-jerks are out in force, blaming rape on men, and encouraging women to have no accountability whatsoever in the perpetuation of rape culture.

That party line is as old as the social troll-hags that started the modern CIA backed feminist movement, with the absence of communist and CIA backed Abzugs, Steinems, Dworkins, and Friedans.

Maybe modern feminism just isn’t Communist enough, or Jewish enough to inspire larger crowds of hopefuls to catch the attention of CIA buy-in; or maybe they aren’t as good looking as they once were, those sexually liberated women of lost ages; or maybe they just bought in themselves.

They sure are Dworkinesque though, in every sense of the word: rotted minds and fallow bodies.

Dworkinesque: coined after Andrea Dworkin(below): women who are fat, mean, sad man-haters who never get any GOOD dick.

SEXUAL INTERCOURSE “Intercourse remains a means, or the means, of physiologically making a woman inferior: communicating to her, cell by cell, her own inferior status . . . pushing and thrusting till she gives in.”

I mean, how would Dworkin know anything about sexual intercourse with a man? And yet her summation of sex has become mantra for these SlutWalkers, and such rhetoric is the fertilizer of growth of the modern American police conglomerate.

Strange contradiction–especially in light of the fact that none of these women seem to care  that there are over 2.3 million American men in jail facing the possibility of being raped daily, both at the hands of “other mothers children,” and the institutions of the police.

Police routinely abuse males (other mothers sons), but women are strangely silent about that, as if men who get abused by police are a mothers dirty secret. And police routinely lock up victims of male on male violence and assault instead of perpetrators, but there still is no outcry against women who employ false rape allegations.

You can’t have your cake and walk it too…

Have you ever seen a more motley and mentally grotesquely shaped group of feminists? It makes me long for the days when feminists were merely CIA operatives warring for control of female sex, and female bodies.

Slutwalk Seattle definitely raised awareness of one thing for sure: ugly people need attention too.

The root of False rape claims, the CIA and Agency-Feminism.

In Freud and the Police, Police abuse women, Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Personality, Profile the Police, Rape Culture, security theater on June 14, 2011 at 8:36 pm

Mind Controlled Sex Slaves and the CIA.

Roots of the false rape accusation syndrome, and how women enable Rape Culture, an American history lesson .

Real, actual rapes happen, but despite the rhetoric, America as an entity doesn’t care about that. The nation cares instead about how it can manipulate personal, private pain into national financial gain.

First, America was allowed by the international community to get away with the human rights atrocities of the Viet Nam war, because then, in the wake of WW2, we were the ‘do-good’ go-to people; the good guys who beat Hitler.

So international banksters and the military industrial complex took advantage of this international perception, and the CIA created and funded feminists whose dialogues of division seized control of the domestic climate.The government inched closer to American children.

The FBI all too willingly bought into agency- feminist* backed schemes to seize American children, even as the CIA raped children overseas. In current vernacular, theFBI claims a desire to end “child exploitation and human trafficking,” while overlooking, or nodding and winking at the perpetrators of such violence.

This same collusion created the horror of CIA social and sexual experimentation on the people–the men, the women, and especially the children of Cambodia, Thailand, and Viet Nam.

In other words, the CIA’s rapes of Southeast Asian people, and the fact that they were allowed to get away with it without consequences from the International community, led to the current American domestic war: the FBI hunt for perpetrators of rape in Southeast Asia, but a far more lasting result was achieved: the rape society and its progeny, the rapeology method of social control in America, and internationally.

Child exploitation and trafficking  is a for them, merely another tool of social control, an excercise in propaganda.

Both agencies have missed the real perpetrators, because they are the perpetrators. It is women who have primary access to children, and thus, the values, mores and norms that are established for these children is by the women who birthed them; not least of those ‘norms’ is the childs sexuality.

Modern Feminism embodies the female political body, the object that is and has always been a tool male embodied CIA social control; and such women as Gloria Steinem–an active CIA agent and organizer—worked with the likes of Henry Kissinger to create the false rape society in America, and all of its progeny overseas.

We can see the direct and current link of the CIA, and feminist theory in the prosecution of visionary Julian Assange. His accusers, Ana Ardin and Sofia Wilen are now acknowledged to be in collusion to falsify their testimony about Assange.

Meet Assange’s primary accuser–a CIA operative.

Ardin has also published “a seven step guide on how to get revenge on cheating boyfriends”( google that phrase), whose links have now been removed from the internet-the ENTIRE internet. : Ana Ardin .
She has many active links to the feminist hate groups, the CIA, and CIA operatives, and is now widely recognized as a false rape crier.

The residue of this sort of black collaboration is the voyeur like impulse of the do-gooder society–by now exported all over the world– to ‘seek out’ and lay blame not on America, and its tens of thousands of uncounted rapes of Southeast Asians, but on the men who go there for sex tourism(and women, too, from all over the world).  Blaming men in general–waging war on males.

Worse, for all societies, is that Americas policy of not naming so-called rape victims is akin to a secret process that will lead to secret trials, and secret proceedings everywhere.

Feminism, in its concerned voyeur stance contributes as much or more to current sexual exploitation around the world. Its version of exploitation masquerades as the den mother , or the dirty lesbian gym teacher to the charade of “right posture” in matters of sexuality, while being allowed unfettered access to children.

They then indoctrinate and then pimp those children into “right” attitudes, and “right” ideologies of sexuality–in the American case, the ideology of bartering a womans sliding scale of truth telling against America’s larger objective of controlling the worlds resources and finances.

The CIA used the people as a training ground for sexual shame based social programming, during and after the time US soldiers were there–many if not most of them against their will–and the real crime of that war was how the CIA perpetrated its sexual brainwashing of these Asian people.

The video demonstrates the  after-effects of such a collusion, not the primary status of the culture under attack by US agents of control. Men are shown as panderers, and perverts, women as victims of those men, and children as sex slaves, without mentioning the previous fifty years of US involvement ion the region, or tactics of  CIA creation of sex camps and sexual indoctrination . The reporter-provocateur format of the ‘investigation’ demonstrates the nature of the voyeuristic ‘do-gooders’ who gain access to children through such means.

While the cripplingly vast majority of men never travel to such places, the do-gooder society is extending its reach all over the world, exporting strange American sex experiments overseas, and using such social experiments as foils against insight into the true nature of America.

American agency-feminist women desire getting ever closer to these children–while minimizing rapes perpetrated by the US government, its unchecked CIA, and the portraying the myths that the FBI  is waging war against  human trafficking, or child exploitation. They are all waging war against Americans, and the genie is out of the bottle–or more appropriately, that junk in Pandoras box looks pretty infectious.

* agency feminists are women who claim to be feminists, but are actually FBI or CIA agents provocateurs with sliding scales of morality. They are the psychopathic other halves of state  terror waged against citizens.

The New Operations Manual from the F.B.I.

In Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Hack Privacy, Police Personality, Profile the Police on June 14, 2011 at 12:39 am

…is due to be realeased, as the FBI raids privacy rights, and wages war against American Civil Libertie.

My prediction: it will be a barely read or understood text, interpreted roughly by clubfooted and should-have-retired-years-ago second stringer agents and salary strung out adrenalin junkies, just like the old one.

Second prediction: the FBI continues its war against American citizens, but will lose on many fronts if Americans unite to protect their civil rights.

Look at you, sitting there twiddling your thumbs on the anniversary of the release of the Pentagon Papers, while your privacy rights are thrown out the window by the FBI, while they are looking in your windows.

If you thought that the old operations manual of the FBI  demonstrated how willing they are to poke their nose into your butt crack, listen in on you taking a dump while talking to your wife or other business associates; sniff through your garbage, spy on your kids in the shower,feed your dog so it shuts up when they are sneaking around in your yard, and harassing you until you commit crimes, you should read this.

The New Operations Manual from the F.B.I...

According to the New York Times, they have expanded their desire to get into your bank accounts, your little black book, your garage porn stash, talk to your buddies at the bar, or leer at your wife and kids so extensively, that the old operations manual–the one they used to illegally follow peace activists, anti-war activists, and other non-violent citizen- was thrown out the window.

From NY Times:

F.B.I. Agents Get Leeway to Push Privacy Bounds

WASHINGTON — The Federal Bureau of Investigation is giving significant new powers to its roughly 14,000 agents, allowing them more leeway to search databases, go through household trash or use surveillance teams to scrutinize the lives of people who have attracted their attention. [ notice this key phrase that blames victims of FBI harassment for the harassment: “people who have attracted their attention,” as if anyone wants that–a bunch of overpaid, uncreative types drawing conclusions about you to justify their paychecks]

Valerie E. Caproni, FBI genital counsel
photo by Brendan Smialowski for The New York Times

Valerie E. Caproni, the F.B.I. general counsel, said the bureau had carefully considered each change to its operations manual.

The new rules add to several measures taken over the past decade to give agents more latitude as they search for signs of criminal or terrorist activity.

———————————————————————————————-

The new, female face of the FBI is just like a prudish, fat old soccer mom gone crazy, with a massive overly compulsive urge to get at the secrets of her pubescent teenaged sons and daughters, while protecting her own dildos in her top dresser drawer.

Only problem is, American citizens aren’t teenagers, despite their sheepish compliance in the face of this form of domestic terror waged by the FBI. But former FBI agents are aware of the extent that the old field manual wasn’t followed.

According to the Times: “Michael German, a former F.B.I. agent who is now a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, argued that it was unwise to further ease restrictions on agents’ power,” because FBI agents are notorious for criminal behavior, and all too eager to falsify, or plant evidence to create a case.

“Claiming additional authorities to investigate people only further raises the potential for abuse,” Mr. German said, pointing to complaints about the bureau’s surveillance of domestic political advocacy groups and mosques and to an inspector general’s findings in 2007 that the F.B.I. had frequently misused “national security letters,”.

The FBI has opened tens of thousands of unsubstantiated investigations of American citizens in the years following 9/11, with a less than a 1% rate of prosecution.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/13/us/13fbi.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=general

American Police want to fuck your daughters

In Freud and the Police, Police abuse women, Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Personality, Profile the Police, Uncategorized on June 2, 2011 at 12:31 am

America wants access to your daughters

…and if they can’t do that, they have all kinds of ways to touch them, feel them up, or tickle their minds—and yours too, not least of which is to claim that women overseas need their veils lifted.

Whereas Egyptian military and police even perform virginity checks by peering into young women’s vaginas, here in America, we still rely on the mechanisms of police infrastructure, and Child Protective Services virginity rituals, like forcing children into contact with the anatomically correct doll, which routinely leads to false positives of child abuse.

So, it appears that police around the world are catching on the techniques of social control that American police have used for years.

CNN reports that Egyptian military police not only performed virginity tests on young women protesters, but that they did it for their own good.

“The [un-named] general went on to insist that the tests were necessary because “we didn’t want (the women) to say we had sexually assaulted or raped them, so we wanted to prove they weren’t virgins in the first place.” the military denied the accusations, but in the past few days, a senior general has confirmed to CNN that indeed, the virginity tests happened.

The general justified the abuse by saying these women “were not like your daughter or mine. These were girls who had camped out in tents with male protesters.”

Even though the Egyptians are still a bit more transparent than American police, the tactic is the same: victimize dissenters ( and their parents)or the under classes, blame the victims, cast a shadow of doubt by implying “these people are not like you or me”, and then backpedal and do damage control in the press.

Sounds a bit like the CIA’s pet project, the MKULTRA descendant of the “child abuse witch hunts” of America in the 1980’s.

American Police and social workers kidnap American kids all the time.

American police act within the agency of Child Protective Services to steal American children  and then ritually rape them with MKULTRA-like processes of brainwashing, experiential sublimation, and ritualized shaming of their actual parents.

And when they discovered some success with that means of social control, they exported mind control and rape ideology overseas.

“The CPS steals children using the system paid for by citizens who believe it is being used to protect those in need. That is a fraud; the system actually pumps money into the personal accounts of all those involved in the system, converting children into cash while destroying them and their families.The number of children who emerge from the system, able to function normally, are near zero. Some are never seen again.”

American Social workers kidnap children[ here, and here]   and American religious fanatics like Michelle Bachman adopt them, or “take them in” to foster care, inserting their ideology into traumatized children. Michelle Bachman and others like her also get paid to “foster” children.

(foster care paycheck amounts for Minnesota could not be found in the official record, but in California, for each foster child placed in your home, you will receive a foster care reimbursement …from $446 to $ 667 per , “ and special needs kids pay out at $84.00 or $169.00 per month higher.)

Michelle Bachman also gets paid state dollars and uses them to brainwash vulnerable people with Christian fundamentalist brainwashing. 

Despite Americas propaganda machine whitewashing the kidnap of American children, Americans are no strangers to lifting Islamic womens veils either.

Remember this headline, from 2001, when America began its invasion plan of Iraq, instead of finding Osama?

I do. “Lifting the Veil on What Afghan Women Really want.”

That headline and its variations has been the voyeuristic call to arms ever since, and it appears that as the Western media focuses on eastern peoples, our own military men and women are craving access to virginity cloaked in noble sounding phrases of liberation.

It’s as if Americas whole inward repression of sexuality, and CIA initiated sexual experimentation resulted in a sort of mechanized, ritualized, and fetishist objectification of women overseas–as if western women’s sexuality has dried into a prune-state, and they seek to lift veils of women elsewhere.

Americas military, in sync with international financiers, and CIA cultural control planning, is just the tool to get that job done, too: they start with your daughters.

US and western backed policy has led to 2 million rapes, and 6 million deaths in the Congo in recent years, according to some sources, and some fancy math.

That is no small estimate, either, because it comes from a study published in the American Journal of Public Health ( for those of you who need official sources)

I say fancy math, because the tradition here in the west is to minimize, or under-estimate the deaths of males, while inflating evidence of rape (using the magic of definitional biases, sliding scales of what constitutes a rape, and womens groups who ignore, or conflate the deaths of men with “mens choices,” while maximizing and blaming the impact of rape on “mens choices” as well. The New York Times can explain the Congo Rape math better )

The fact remains: American soldiers are the ritual rapists of nations, and value systems that differ with capitalist agendas, and American women are more than complicit in that rape.

They have put their ideology into and under the lives and veils of the daughters of the middle east.

What’s next, Jasmine Revolution?

http://webistan.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/Afghan-women-lifting-the-veil/G0000C_.evA5Xfuc/I0000CTOZokfbCSg

Police want to peek into your babies diapers…

In Freud and the Police, Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Personality, Profile the Police, Uncategorized on June 1, 2011 at 10:10 pm

…and they are relying upon social structures that uphold the police personality, hoping that conformists will affirm that society isn’t wrong to have an unhealthy fascination about what genital is or isn’t dangling there.

Toronto parents Kathy Witterick, 38, and her husband, David Stocker, 39, have faced a brutal public backlash since their refusal to allow the public a peak between the legs of their new-born child.

According to MSNBC, Witterick wrote in an e-mail “that the idea that “the whole world must know what is between the baby’s legs is unhealthy, unsafe and voyeuristic. We know — and we’re keeping it clean, safe, healthy and private (not secret!).”

The police personality, is upheld by the “norms” in society, and society upholds the norms of police repression of non-conformity.
Such an alliance is one that demands to know even intimate details of a families lives, and acts as a social change agent to conform families to the top-down authoritarian model of social control that puts police and their agents first in childrens lives. 
 In a police state, family allegiance comes second to the societal impulse to impose genderized models upon childrens minds. In other words, modern western society, with the aid of police and state structures, wants to “sex your baby.”
Witterick said the argument that children need a sex taught to them in order to feel safe in the world does not hold up in their experience.

The police personality is constantly on the look-out for opportunities to insert itself into your private life, and will stop at nothing to do so. The public at large, in expressing overt hostility towards the childs family, is upholding police structures of secondary control: the reliance of the police on their ability to manipulate public perception before they officially “intervene.”

Police agency primarily relies upon, instills, and upholds fear based responses such as in this case, where both parents agree that the only likely thing to fear isn’t the childs experience with its own gender awakening, but rather social reaction to their refusal to sex their child.

Storm’s parents told the Toronto Star, that Storm’s parents know their child’s sex, as do Storm’s older brothers. The goal of keeping the information inside the family,  is to limit messages that tell young children how to act based on their sex.those messages by the time Storm decides Storm would like to share [his or her gender],” Storm’s mom Kathy Witterick told the Toronto Star.

“We thought if we delayed sharing that information, in this case, hopefully, we might knock off a couple those messages by the time Storm decides Storm would like to share [his or her gender],” Storm’s mom Kathy Witterick told the Toronto Star.

Police hack computers

In Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Personality, Profile the Police, Supreme Court complicit with police power, Uncategorized on May 31, 2011 at 9:49 pm

…and often plant evidence, malicious computer code, and other mal-bots, but it is remarkably hard to prove.

Even harder to prove once they manipulate, destroy, or outsource the evidence.

Despite years of the FBI claiming noble moral high ground

”]its secret programs of hacking, placing back doors in victim computers, and planting viruses on cell phones, America now claims the right to call other countries hacking an “act of war?”

WASHINGTON — In its first formal cyber strategy, the Pentagon has concluded that computer sabotage by another country could constitute an act of war, administration and military sources told NBC News on Tuesday, confirming a report in the Wall Street Journal.”

Most hacking done by the United States government is intent on breaking in to computers of foreign nations and dignitaries. Using CIA complexes in Langley Virginia and its surrounding regions and in sync with the NSA in Fort Meade MD, they do the majority of their cyber-crime. American spy networks also use libraries and college data bases that are often unwitting hosts of hidden CIA , and NSA use or  infiltration.

But the real dirty work is often outsourced to private companies, or done by the U.S. military from offshore locations in the Eastern Bloc countries, the Philippines, or by using front companies that provide server space in other host nations.

‘How the world works’
Rich Mogull, analyst and CEO of Phoenix-based security research firm Securosis, noted that governments and defense agencies have been spying on each other throughout history. Computers have just made it easier to do so electronically.

“This is just what countries do,” he said. “It’s the unfortunate reality of how the world works.

Our government hides its tracks fairly well, using massive networks of phony and anonymous IP addresses, and malware that writes code onto hacked hard drives, and then erases itself after their dirty work is done.

But who can stand against the overly- burdensome rights of corporations who are known to flout policy and law? American corporations have formed unholy alliances and smashed the rights of other nations for years, most recently in Colombia, where America has for years been the primary distributor of cocaine, murderer of workers, and suppressor of the truth until it became a politically untenable position.  (abused people and relatives of murdered victims sue Chiquita for 1 billion)

Perhaps the biggest threat to the rights of human beings, and individuals, who uphold individual rights for human beings, is the privatization of spying. Given what corporations have shown us in the past, the future of actual cyber-security looks glum, negotiable, and unaccountable.