Justice For-All

Posts Tagged ‘Domestic violence’

The Mental Rapist; or FBI pre-natal Mind-fucking Primer 101

In Freud and the Police, Its for theChildren, Police abuse women, Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Personality, security theater on July 20, 2011 at 1:33 am
FBI agent in 1939

Who is That Creepy Guy Around the Corner? Photo of FBI Agent in 1939 Image via Wikipedia

The FBI Describes Itself When it Employs Profiles.

Imagine if your daughter stumbled across this headfuck, “The Mental Rapist Enjoys Abusing Women,” an article purportedly transcribed from a conversation that someone had with an FBI agent about “mind-rapists,” which to the best of my knowledge means “head-fuckers.”

And nobody can compete with the big-budget propaganda campaign waged against your kids mind by the FBI with the exception of Hollywood, which is literally in lockstep with FBI propaganda.

The profile of the FBI is as an agency is that it is driven by pathological narcissism, which is a mental disease masquerading as a noble intentioned, but self deluded entity or person[s] *

I don’t know your daughter, but I do care about what you, her father or mother, have to deal with as she evolves into her own person.

And I care twice that your kids mind doesn’t get cluttered too early with police and FBI baggage–mind manipulation,  fear mongering, and propaganda as a tool of distraction away from real issues–like the fact that America is dropping bombs, and depleted uranium all over the middle east.

I mean, sure, the argument could be made that the Middle East isn’t in the FBI jurisdiction on that matter–but that didnt’t stop them from hunting down turr-err-isss’s in Germany, Iraq, Pakistan, et al did it?

And certainly, the companies that are dropping depleted uranium have headquarters in the U.S., right?

But they want to focus–and they want you to focus–on hypothetical threats to your child’s genitalia instead….WTF!!Q?????

Which makes me wonder what kind of people work there? After all we know that the FBI has a long history of pedophiles in the organization.

WE exist these days in conditions where online predators are the police, fetishizing your kids naivete, and more than willing to isolate her and wreak havoc on her conception of the world.

I care even more when I relaize how many FBI agents are women haters, patriarchs, or gender bashing, bitter gay women using their positions of trust and authority to get at, and corrupt your kids head;and sadly, they target, and focus quite heavily on your daughters rather than your sons.

Don’t get me wrong: I am well aware of how your sons are abused by society, because two boys are murdered in America for every girl killed , and how little attention young boys get when it comes to discussions about ‘protecting children’.

By the time your son reached puberty, he has likely survived a public shcool counselors recomendation that he take Ritalin or some other drug, a coaches recommendation that he “man up,” or in the very least, someform of ostracization because he resists male sexual programming. He has also survived numerous mental and physical assaults aginst his masculine traits by female schoolmates–by ten years of age. I understand that well.

But this post is about your child, and particularly your daughter, being safe from online interactions with police, and FBI agents who CRAWL THE INTERNET LOOKING FOR VULNERABLE, LONELY KIDS TO TALK TO.

And kids are smarter than we give them credit for, and any teen girl out there could stumble upon this post as I did. It is a blog post from awhile ago that got me thinking of the nefarious nature of police propaganda aimed at your daughter, online.

I couldn’t write better propaganda designed to attach itself to your young daughters mind if I were a pedophile gym teacher–it hits the center of isolation in the mind of any girl who feels she has failed at a relationship, been used by a boy, or risked her virginity in a juvenile attempt at love.

It is allegedly a mental profile of a “mental rapist” whyo uses the internet to “rape the mind”, and it’s full of all the right kind of weirdness that could help a girl identify what she feels is an even weirder young boy who hurt her feelings.

But what bothers me th emost, is that some FBI agent actually has the time to write such pap–and target it at a vulnerable woman, or girl. If that agent targets vulnerable women, what might they say to your daughter?

And all that language about “him” does not at all reassure me it isn’t a female agent impersonating a male, and describing herself–after all, the internet is full of weirdos, just looking to profile–or indoctrinate– your kids.

I won’t weigh in to the implications that this could be a fantasy of the blogger, or the entrapment of the bloggers mind, but it is what it is: a conversation between a vulnerable woman and a purported FBI agent.

Police play on fear all the time, and it’s socially destructive, creepy, and very, very police psychology oriented. Almost as if they are telling us what lurks in their minds, not in ours.

And worse, they now have access to your kids online.

* The police and FBI profile is one that includes narcisisstic psychopathology http://www.slideshare.net/samvaknin/narcissistic-and-psychopathic-leaders, particularly marked by unhealthy confabulation, meaning narcissists believe they are better than everyone else, smarter than everyone else, etc. because they are the good guys and gals, while forgetting the egregious, historic, criminal violations of US law that are part of their organizational structure.

Advertisements

The FBI eats child porn for breakfast–and lunch, and dinner, and while on break.

In Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Personality, Profile the Police, security theater on July 12, 2011 at 1:37 am
United States Attorney General Alberto Gonzale...

Hi, remember me? I am Alberto Gonzalez, and I love BDSM and torture photos of 'ethnic men'. And did I mention that the FBI has the largest collection of child porn, dog porn, and war porn on the planet? We watch it, so you don't have to! Image via Wikipedia

“Things I Don’t Want On My Résumé,” part four, revisited.

The dailycaller.com reports on a much under-reported phenomenon amongst police and prosecutor types: they love porn, but even more they like demonizing civilians, and breaking the law while jerking off on the clock–it’s part of the police profile.

“Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder Thursday requesting an explanation as to why the Justice Department declined to file charges against a federal prosecutor with child pornography found on his work computer.

The finding against the Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) was made by the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG).

According to the Inspector General’s report, the AUSA admitted to spending a significant amount of time each day viewing porn at work.”

Read more
REMEMBER THIS BLAST FROM THE PAST?

Apparently, war porn, Abu Ghraib torture photos, and images of little boys being f*cked in the ^ss are not enough for them.

Remember former Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and his obsession with pornography?  He was a family values man–as most cops are–who felt that porn was a threat to the family–his own, apparently, but he, like many cop types also seemed to believe that committing perjury was not at all harmful to the kids.

And he once bragged that the FBI has the largest collection of child porn in the world. Curious what cops brag about, isn’t it?

Even more curious that every time the FBI gets involved in ‘combating illegal stuff” the illegal stuff proliferates, and is suddenly everywhere! Even nuclear bomb secrets, if Sibel Edmonds, former FBI agent is to be believed.

The FBI itself seems to feel that minimization of crimes and perjury by its agents is a major tool in the fight against the bad peeple, and at the time of Gonzalez’ perjury, which was covered-up by current FBI czar Robert S. Mueller the tird,  the FBI priorities were sort of lax on FBI and other rampant police corruption.

Mueller et al were just too busy chasing down terrorists, and orchestrating the dissemination of dog-f*cking porn to prosecute Gonzalez.

The Washington Post, noted at the time when the FBI kicked off its distribution and dissemination of illicit porn initiatives in 2005, that public corruption wasn’t even on the FBI radar of prosecutable crime.

It was officially, [.] fourth on the FBI’s priority list, after protecting the United States from terrorist attack, foreign espionage and cyber-based attacks. Just below those priorities are civil rights, organized crime, white-collar crime and “significant violent crime.” The guidance from headquarters does not mention where pornography fits in.”

I guess it depends on your point of view–after all, Alberto probably lied when his kids asked him about his porn obsession.He also likely lied about his enjoyment of BDSM.

And Alberto himself stated that he had ” nothing to hide,” before perjuring himself over the firing of 9 U.S. Attorney, and wiretapping fraud. And we all know how cops feel when someone has “nothing to hide,” right?

So there is little surprise when we hear of yet another cop caught loooking at porn, and kiddie porn–after all, we know how much the police want to love YOUR daughters.

SlutWalk Raises Awareness of the Need for Therapists, not Cops

In CIA anf Feminism, Police abuse women, Police Personality, Rape Culture, security theater on June 20, 2011 at 11:29 pm

enGendering Rape awareness aim of Sunday’s SlutWalk in Seattle

quotes Rapists don’t go for the prettiest or sexiest or the interestingly dressed. They go… Read more

SlutWalk, the social movement sparked by a Toronto policeman’s comment about rape and dressing provocatively* [ emphasis mine], came to Seattle on Sunday afternoon.

A feisty crowd of chanting, sign-waving, selfdescribed “sluts” marched down Pine Street from Capitol Hill’s Cal Anderson Park to Westlake Center — stopping traffic, confounding tourists and drawing an enthusiastic crowd of onlookers.

Seattle’s event is part of an international series of slutwalks, which got their start earlier this year after a Toronto police officer told a group of women that to avoid being the victims of rape or abuse, they should not dress like sluts.

The suggestion that women are to blame for a rape or sexual violence because of the way they dress has inspired activists to organize walks in Toronto, Boston, Dallas and Ottawa, Ontario. On Saturday, about 200 participants marched in the Spokane SlutWalk. Seattle police estimated about 500 participated in Sunday’s event.

[ notice the photog above featured the one “attractive girl”, instead of the great mass of obese women in attendance–how pimping/ lookist is that? But these women are more open to police/social control, because they seek approval]

———————————————————————————————————————————————

* provocatively: to provoke

Slutwalkers Need TheRapists.

I don’t think Slutwalking does a thing for raising awareness about rape or rape culture but it does put female ugliness on display, in more ways than one.

Gone are the days of svelt Playboy bunny and neoCIA agent Gloria Steinem, and in with tattooed manwomen, dorky, cowardly desperate manboys, and the obese–and everyone who agrees with the statement that men deserve what they get if they “provoke” a bully, right?

Wrong. Modern feminists are so estranged from real men that they can only make their appeals to police rape culture, because real men are constantly under violent social pressures of conformity, and isolated from the dialogues.

Don’t think modern feminism is an ugly tool of social control? Take a look yourself at the Seattle Slutwalkers.

As usual, the standard knee-jerks are out in force, blaming rape on men, and encouraging women to have no accountability whatsoever in the perpetuation of rape culture.

That party line is as old as the social troll-hags that started the modern CIA backed feminist movement, with the absence of communist and CIA backed Abzugs, Steinems, Dworkins, and Friedans.

Maybe modern feminism just isn’t Communist enough, or Jewish enough to inspire larger crowds of hopefuls to catch the attention of CIA buy-in; or maybe they aren’t as good looking as they once were, those sexually liberated women of lost ages; or maybe they just bought in themselves.

They sure are Dworkinesque though, in every sense of the word: rotted minds and fallow bodies.

Dworkinesque: coined after Andrea Dworkin(below): women who are fat, mean, sad man-haters who never get any GOOD dick.

SEXUAL INTERCOURSE “Intercourse remains a means, or the means, of physiologically making a woman inferior: communicating to her, cell by cell, her own inferior status . . . pushing and thrusting till she gives in.”

I mean, how would Dworkin know anything about sexual intercourse with a man? And yet her summation of sex has become mantra for these SlutWalkers, and such rhetoric is the fertilizer of growth of the modern American police conglomerate.

Strange contradiction–especially in light of the fact that none of these women seem to care  that there are over 2.3 million American men in jail facing the possibility of being raped daily, both at the hands of “other mothers children,” and the institutions of the police.

Police routinely abuse males (other mothers sons), but women are strangely silent about that, as if men who get abused by police are a mothers dirty secret. And police routinely lock up victims of male on male violence and assault instead of perpetrators, but there still is no outcry against women who employ false rape allegations.

You can’t have your cake and walk it too…

Have you ever seen a more motley and mentally grotesquely shaped group of feminists? It makes me long for the days when feminists were merely CIA operatives warring for control of female sex, and female bodies.

Slutwalk Seattle definitely raised awareness of one thing for sure: ugly people need attention too.

The root of False rape claims, the CIA and Agency-Feminism.

In Freud and the Police, Police abuse women, Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Personality, Profile the Police, Rape Culture, security theater on June 14, 2011 at 8:36 pm

Mind Controlled Sex Slaves and the CIA.

Roots of the false rape accusation syndrome, and how women enable Rape Culture, an American history lesson .

Real, actual rapes happen, but despite the rhetoric, America as an entity doesn’t care about that. The nation cares instead about how it can manipulate personal, private pain into national financial gain.

First, America was allowed by the international community to get away with the human rights atrocities of the Viet Nam war, because then, in the wake of WW2, we were the ‘do-good’ go-to people; the good guys who beat Hitler.

So international banksters and the military industrial complex took advantage of this international perception, and the CIA created and funded feminists whose dialogues of division seized control of the domestic climate.The government inched closer to American children.

The FBI all too willingly bought into agency- feminist* backed schemes to seize American children, even as the CIA raped children overseas. In current vernacular, theFBI claims a desire to end “child exploitation and human trafficking,” while overlooking, or nodding and winking at the perpetrators of such violence.

This same collusion created the horror of CIA social and sexual experimentation on the people–the men, the women, and especially the children of Cambodia, Thailand, and Viet Nam.

In other words, the CIA’s rapes of Southeast Asian people, and the fact that they were allowed to get away with it without consequences from the International community, led to the current American domestic war: the FBI hunt for perpetrators of rape in Southeast Asia, but a far more lasting result was achieved: the rape society and its progeny, the rapeology method of social control in America, and internationally.

Child exploitation and trafficking  is a for them, merely another tool of social control, an excercise in propaganda.

Both agencies have missed the real perpetrators, because they are the perpetrators. It is women who have primary access to children, and thus, the values, mores and norms that are established for these children is by the women who birthed them; not least of those ‘norms’ is the childs sexuality.

Modern Feminism embodies the female political body, the object that is and has always been a tool male embodied CIA social control; and such women as Gloria Steinem–an active CIA agent and organizer—worked with the likes of Henry Kissinger to create the false rape society in America, and all of its progeny overseas.

We can see the direct and current link of the CIA, and feminist theory in the prosecution of visionary Julian Assange. His accusers, Ana Ardin and Sofia Wilen are now acknowledged to be in collusion to falsify their testimony about Assange.

Meet Assange’s primary accuser–a CIA operative.

Ardin has also published “a seven step guide on how to get revenge on cheating boyfriends”( google that phrase), whose links have now been removed from the internet-the ENTIRE internet. : Ana Ardin .
She has many active links to the feminist hate groups, the CIA, and CIA operatives, and is now widely recognized as a false rape crier.

The residue of this sort of black collaboration is the voyeur like impulse of the do-gooder society–by now exported all over the world– to ‘seek out’ and lay blame not on America, and its tens of thousands of uncounted rapes of Southeast Asians, but on the men who go there for sex tourism(and women, too, from all over the world).  Blaming men in general–waging war on males.

Worse, for all societies, is that Americas policy of not naming so-called rape victims is akin to a secret process that will lead to secret trials, and secret proceedings everywhere.

Feminism, in its concerned voyeur stance contributes as much or more to current sexual exploitation around the world. Its version of exploitation masquerades as the den mother , or the dirty lesbian gym teacher to the charade of “right posture” in matters of sexuality, while being allowed unfettered access to children.

They then indoctrinate and then pimp those children into “right” attitudes, and “right” ideologies of sexuality–in the American case, the ideology of bartering a womans sliding scale of truth telling against America’s larger objective of controlling the worlds resources and finances.

The CIA used the people as a training ground for sexual shame based social programming, during and after the time US soldiers were there–many if not most of them against their will–and the real crime of that war was how the CIA perpetrated its sexual brainwashing of these Asian people.

The video demonstrates the  after-effects of such a collusion, not the primary status of the culture under attack by US agents of control. Men are shown as panderers, and perverts, women as victims of those men, and children as sex slaves, without mentioning the previous fifty years of US involvement ion the region, or tactics of  CIA creation of sex camps and sexual indoctrination . The reporter-provocateur format of the ‘investigation’ demonstrates the nature of the voyeuristic ‘do-gooders’ who gain access to children through such means.

While the cripplingly vast majority of men never travel to such places, the do-gooder society is extending its reach all over the world, exporting strange American sex experiments overseas, and using such social experiments as foils against insight into the true nature of America.

American agency-feminist women desire getting ever closer to these children–while minimizing rapes perpetrated by the US government, its unchecked CIA, and the portraying the myths that the FBI  is waging war against  human trafficking, or child exploitation. They are all waging war against Americans, and the genie is out of the bottle–or more appropriately, that junk in Pandoras box looks pretty infectious.

* agency feminists are women who claim to be feminists, but are actually FBI or CIA agents provocateurs with sliding scales of morality. They are the psychopathic other halves of state  terror waged against citizens.

The New Operations Manual from the F.B.I.

In Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Hack Privacy, Police Personality, Profile the Police on June 14, 2011 at 12:39 am

…is due to be realeased, as the FBI raids privacy rights, and wages war against American Civil Libertie.

My prediction: it will be a barely read or understood text, interpreted roughly by clubfooted and should-have-retired-years-ago second stringer agents and salary strung out adrenalin junkies, just like the old one.

Second prediction: the FBI continues its war against American citizens, but will lose on many fronts if Americans unite to protect their civil rights.

Look at you, sitting there twiddling your thumbs on the anniversary of the release of the Pentagon Papers, while your privacy rights are thrown out the window by the FBI, while they are looking in your windows.

If you thought that the old operations manual of the FBI  demonstrated how willing they are to poke their nose into your butt crack, listen in on you taking a dump while talking to your wife or other business associates; sniff through your garbage, spy on your kids in the shower,feed your dog so it shuts up when they are sneaking around in your yard, and harassing you until you commit crimes, you should read this.

The New Operations Manual from the F.B.I...

According to the New York Times, they have expanded their desire to get into your bank accounts, your little black book, your garage porn stash, talk to your buddies at the bar, or leer at your wife and kids so extensively, that the old operations manual–the one they used to illegally follow peace activists, anti-war activists, and other non-violent citizen- was thrown out the window.

From NY Times:

F.B.I. Agents Get Leeway to Push Privacy Bounds

WASHINGTON — The Federal Bureau of Investigation is giving significant new powers to its roughly 14,000 agents, allowing them more leeway to search databases, go through household trash or use surveillance teams to scrutinize the lives of people who have attracted their attention. [ notice this key phrase that blames victims of FBI harassment for the harassment: “people who have attracted their attention,” as if anyone wants that–a bunch of overpaid, uncreative types drawing conclusions about you to justify their paychecks]

Valerie E. Caproni, FBI genital counsel
photo by Brendan Smialowski for The New York Times

Valerie E. Caproni, the F.B.I. general counsel, said the bureau had carefully considered each change to its operations manual.

The new rules add to several measures taken over the past decade to give agents more latitude as they search for signs of criminal or terrorist activity.

———————————————————————————————-

The new, female face of the FBI is just like a prudish, fat old soccer mom gone crazy, with a massive overly compulsive urge to get at the secrets of her pubescent teenaged sons and daughters, while protecting her own dildos in her top dresser drawer.

Only problem is, American citizens aren’t teenagers, despite their sheepish compliance in the face of this form of domestic terror waged by the FBI. But former FBI agents are aware of the extent that the old field manual wasn’t followed.

According to the Times: “Michael German, a former F.B.I. agent who is now a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, argued that it was unwise to further ease restrictions on agents’ power,” because FBI agents are notorious for criminal behavior, and all too eager to falsify, or plant evidence to create a case.

“Claiming additional authorities to investigate people only further raises the potential for abuse,” Mr. German said, pointing to complaints about the bureau’s surveillance of domestic political advocacy groups and mosques and to an inspector general’s findings in 2007 that the F.B.I. had frequently misused “national security letters,”.

The FBI has opened tens of thousands of unsubstantiated investigations of American citizens in the years following 9/11, with a less than a 1% rate of prosecution.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/13/us/13fbi.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=general

American Police want to fuck your daughters

In Freud and the Police, Police abuse women, Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Personality, Profile the Police, Uncategorized on June 2, 2011 at 12:31 am

America wants access to your daughters

…and if they can’t do that, they have all kinds of ways to touch them, feel them up, or tickle their minds—and yours too, not least of which is to claim that women overseas need their veils lifted.

Whereas Egyptian military and police even perform virginity checks by peering into young women’s vaginas, here in America, we still rely on the mechanisms of police infrastructure, and Child Protective Services virginity rituals, like forcing children into contact with the anatomically correct doll, which routinely leads to false positives of child abuse.

So, it appears that police around the world are catching on the techniques of social control that American police have used for years.

CNN reports that Egyptian military police not only performed virginity tests on young women protesters, but that they did it for their own good.

“The [un-named] general went on to insist that the tests were necessary because “we didn’t want (the women) to say we had sexually assaulted or raped them, so we wanted to prove they weren’t virgins in the first place.” the military denied the accusations, but in the past few days, a senior general has confirmed to CNN that indeed, the virginity tests happened.

The general justified the abuse by saying these women “were not like your daughter or mine. These were girls who had camped out in tents with male protesters.”

Even though the Egyptians are still a bit more transparent than American police, the tactic is the same: victimize dissenters ( and their parents)or the under classes, blame the victims, cast a shadow of doubt by implying “these people are not like you or me”, and then backpedal and do damage control in the press.

Sounds a bit like the CIA’s pet project, the MKULTRA descendant of the “child abuse witch hunts” of America in the 1980’s.

American Police and social workers kidnap American kids all the time.

American police act within the agency of Child Protective Services to steal American children  and then ritually rape them with MKULTRA-like processes of brainwashing, experiential sublimation, and ritualized shaming of their actual parents.

And when they discovered some success with that means of social control, they exported mind control and rape ideology overseas.

“The CPS steals children using the system paid for by citizens who believe it is being used to protect those in need. That is a fraud; the system actually pumps money into the personal accounts of all those involved in the system, converting children into cash while destroying them and their families.The number of children who emerge from the system, able to function normally, are near zero. Some are never seen again.”

American Social workers kidnap children[ here, and here]   and American religious fanatics like Michelle Bachman adopt them, or “take them in” to foster care, inserting their ideology into traumatized children. Michelle Bachman and others like her also get paid to “foster” children.

(foster care paycheck amounts for Minnesota could not be found in the official record, but in California, for each foster child placed in your home, you will receive a foster care reimbursement …from $446 to $ 667 per , “ and special needs kids pay out at $84.00 or $169.00 per month higher.)

Michelle Bachman also gets paid state dollars and uses them to brainwash vulnerable people with Christian fundamentalist brainwashing. 

Despite Americas propaganda machine whitewashing the kidnap of American children, Americans are no strangers to lifting Islamic womens veils either.

Remember this headline, from 2001, when America began its invasion plan of Iraq, instead of finding Osama?

I do. “Lifting the Veil on What Afghan Women Really want.”

That headline and its variations has been the voyeuristic call to arms ever since, and it appears that as the Western media focuses on eastern peoples, our own military men and women are craving access to virginity cloaked in noble sounding phrases of liberation.

It’s as if Americas whole inward repression of sexuality, and CIA initiated sexual experimentation resulted in a sort of mechanized, ritualized, and fetishist objectification of women overseas–as if western women’s sexuality has dried into a prune-state, and they seek to lift veils of women elsewhere.

Americas military, in sync with international financiers, and CIA cultural control planning, is just the tool to get that job done, too: they start with your daughters.

US and western backed policy has led to 2 million rapes, and 6 million deaths in the Congo in recent years, according to some sources, and some fancy math.

That is no small estimate, either, because it comes from a study published in the American Journal of Public Health ( for those of you who need official sources)

I say fancy math, because the tradition here in the west is to minimize, or under-estimate the deaths of males, while inflating evidence of rape (using the magic of definitional biases, sliding scales of what constitutes a rape, and womens groups who ignore, or conflate the deaths of men with “mens choices,” while maximizing and blaming the impact of rape on “mens choices” as well. The New York Times can explain the Congo Rape math better )

The fact remains: American soldiers are the ritual rapists of nations, and value systems that differ with capitalist agendas, and American women are more than complicit in that rape.

They have put their ideology into and under the lives and veils of the daughters of the middle east.

What’s next, Jasmine Revolution?

http://webistan.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/Afghan-women-lifting-the-veil/G0000C_.evA5Xfuc/I0000CTOZokfbCSg

Police want to peek into your babies diapers…

In Freud and the Police, Police and FBI evidence creation and set-ups, Police Personality, Profile the Police, Uncategorized on June 1, 2011 at 10:10 pm

…and they are relying upon social structures that uphold the police personality, hoping that conformists will affirm that society isn’t wrong to have an unhealthy fascination about what genital is or isn’t dangling there.

Toronto parents Kathy Witterick, 38, and her husband, David Stocker, 39, have faced a brutal public backlash since their refusal to allow the public a peak between the legs of their new-born child.

According to MSNBC, Witterick wrote in an e-mail “that the idea that “the whole world must know what is between the baby’s legs is unhealthy, unsafe and voyeuristic. We know — and we’re keeping it clean, safe, healthy and private (not secret!).”

The police personality, is upheld by the “norms” in society, and society upholds the norms of police repression of non-conformity.
Such an alliance is one that demands to know even intimate details of a families lives, and acts as a social change agent to conform families to the top-down authoritarian model of social control that puts police and their agents first in childrens lives. 
 In a police state, family allegiance comes second to the societal impulse to impose genderized models upon childrens minds. In other words, modern western society, with the aid of police and state structures, wants to “sex your baby.”
Witterick said the argument that children need a sex taught to them in order to feel safe in the world does not hold up in their experience.

The police personality is constantly on the look-out for opportunities to insert itself into your private life, and will stop at nothing to do so. The public at large, in expressing overt hostility towards the childs family, is upholding police structures of secondary control: the reliance of the police on their ability to manipulate public perception before they officially “intervene.”

Police agency primarily relies upon, instills, and upholds fear based responses such as in this case, where both parents agree that the only likely thing to fear isn’t the childs experience with its own gender awakening, but rather social reaction to their refusal to sex their child.

Storm’s parents told the Toronto Star, that Storm’s parents know their child’s sex, as do Storm’s older brothers. The goal of keeping the information inside the family,  is to limit messages that tell young children how to act based on their sex.those messages by the time Storm decides Storm would like to share [his or her gender],” Storm’s mom Kathy Witterick told the Toronto Star.

“We thought if we delayed sharing that information, in this case, hopefully, we might knock off a couple those messages by the time Storm decides Storm would like to share [his or her gender],” Storm’s mom Kathy Witterick told the Toronto Star.

Police kill women…

In Freud and the Police, Police abuse women, Police Personality, Profile the Police on May 31, 2011 at 10:17 pm

”]and police kill their wives, their ex-wives, and often kill themselves afterward, which is not a bad thing.

Sometimes they even kill and wound other police officers while they are at it, which is not a bad thing either, and sometimes cops kill their “loved ones” on sacred cop holidays, like Memorial Day, which is even more metaphorically cool.

But Jonathan Agee killed his wife, while a 12-year-old daughter watched, and it could likely have been prevented

From the story in CNN: “The bloodshed began at 11:30 a.m., when Jennifer Agee, 30, pulled into a Sheetz convenience store parking lot in Roanoke, Virginia, Perkins said. Trailing behind her in a marked Franklin County sheriff’s office car was her ex-husband, Jonathan Agee. The 32-year-old sheriff’s deputy from Boones Mill was off-duty at the time.”

My question is “when will America wake up from its adrenalin filled, police-power induced coma? For instance, what was this off duty police sanctioned murderer doing driving around in a marked squad anyways?”

I don’t really need an answer either, because I know the answer. For the last several decades, America has inserted police into every day affairs, and into every television show, in a mass propaganda campaign to cause us to “respect the police,” “fear the police,” and especially to NOT QUESTION POLICE AUTHORITY.

It is that exact superficial authority that led to the death of 30-year-oldJennifer Agee–the preventable, predictable crimes of police can and should be highly policed–but they’re not.

Imagine if the store clerk who witnessed this act of policeman murdering his wife had been taught to question authority? Imagine if the general public along the route of this homicidal cop had noticed his road raging driving habits, or his intense glare in the direction of his wife’s car?

Imagine if they—you, me, us– had been taught to question police authority?

Now imagine if we as an emerging American society begin to remind ourselves every single day of the importance of questioning police authority. We might have a new world and fewer cop wife’s to bury (not that burying cop-wife’s is a bad thing, because every time a cop kills his wife, it prevents them from passing along cop genes and soiling the  gene pool).

But domestic violence rates amongst police are two to four times as high as in the civilian population.

The old excuse that always creeps out in the press is that American police kill people because of the “stress of the job,” but evidence points to pre-existing flaws in the character of police men and women.

But police are not alone in hiding, minimalizing or forcefully stifling their victims of domestic violence. Prosecutors are complicit in covering up police crimes, and domestic violence is just one more form of sociopathic police conduct.

According to www.purpleberets.org “In San Diego, a national model in domestic violence prosecution, the City Attorney typically prosecutes 92% of referred domestic violence cases, but only 42% of cases where the batterer is a cop.”

The police personality is already predisposed to violence masquerading as heroics, as many of them emphasize physical fitness, and emulate sports oriented, and  ideology.

But they also are trained to be violent, and to maintain a posture of self-righteousness and control which negates them being viewed as what they are.. They are also willing liars, and manipulators of facts, and are trained in the police academy to be “offensive.”

In other words, American police are socially approved sociopaths, and it’s time to police the police, so their peculiar violence doesn’t spill any further than it has already.

They inhabit a perverse western state of mind that believes in “pre-emptive war( the excuse we used to invade Iraq, and lie about Saddam Hussein),” and “preventive war ( the basic philosophy that operated after Pearl Harbor).”  Whichever of these double speaking phrases you choose, they both mean essentially the same thing these days.

It means that the United States and its international police power means “we” through police and soldiers, maintain a right to murder people first, and ask questions later, as long as the propaganda powers can gain popular support for the US brand of homicide, and sell the American public on the flag draped casket full of ideas that claim they–“We” are acting in self defense, but acting first; the bully who says “hey, are you looking at me?? before it socks you in the eye.”

In other words, for American and other western police, self defense is interpreted as a right to be offensive.

So, obviously, when Jonathan Agee killed his wife, he was acting in self defense, just like all the other cops who kill their wives, all over the western and westernized  world.[ here , here, , here , here ,  and endlessly elsewhere]

They also inhabit a curious realm within the western philosophy of capitalism, and uphold only money, and property rights, while destroying the lives of others through a steady stream of adrenalin feuled false heroics, and implicating the weak, the mentally ill, and the poor in crimes of addiction, or poverty.

In the words of Robert Kennedy:

” There is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions: indifference and inaction and slow decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skins have different colors. This is the slow destruction of a child by hunger, and schools without books and homes without heat in the winter.”

Bobby, I would only add that a new, and far more insidious killer than race or poverty has emerged ever present, and ever victorious in American society: the power of a police structure, or a police state that breaks the laws it makes, and abuses citizens in ever increasing numbers. They reign superior, even if in their own minds, and that is a bad bad thing.

The police embody power, and the disproportionate exercise of that power over the lives of others, and, sometimes, over their own family members. They are the new middle class ideology of class control; the new bully pulpit; a typical American answer to a failed ideology of adrenalin pumped, gas power fueled mass consumerism.

So, pre-emptively, we ask: maybe it’s time to police the police? Because police are becoming more and more offensive every day–even on the sacred cow day of Memorial Day.

Cops think guns are penises…

In Police Personality, Profile the Police, Uncategorized on May 17, 2011 at 11:43 pm
Common chimpanzee in the Leipzig Zoo.

Image via Wikipedia

and they like to play with them, and try to impress women, just like chimpanzees.

Cops also often intervene in “domestic violence,” with only one thought in mind: men are the sole perpetrators, women are victims, and cops are the “heroes”–even though statistics clearly show that women initiate violence more often than men, and often with another male accomplice to cover her tracks. Worse,  men who find themselves caught in the cycle of domestic violence ( where more often than not women are the initiators of the violence) are at risk of being murdered by police, even though cops themselves bully women. 

If a cop even tries to take a stand against violence, or the homicidal nature of police in America, he is likely to be labeled a coward by other police. Then, an official black-balling takes place, and a smear campaign behind the scenes. Police even think its o.k. to beat men in wheelchairs, even after those men are handcuffed. You can mosy over to Detective Shaved Longcock, and get an address of where you can write to the cop who beat the guy in the wheelchair, or tell him what  a nut I am for saying that cops are stuck in the phallic stage.

But in the US Virgin Islands, an off-duty ATF agent murdered a man who was one half of a domestic dispute. The ATF “investigated” William G. Clark, and found him “not guilty,” without a trial, or civilian review. Most police misconduct is covered up before it ever goes to trial, and before the public ever gets to see the facts.  We  all know the biases, deceptions, and cover-ups that are the very heart of police investigations.

The Virgin Islands prosecutors came to a different, and more plausible, fair, and human decision: they decided that the ATF agent should face a trial, like any civilian in a similar situation would face.

But American cops are above the law–they are better than you apparently.

“The prosecution of Special Agent William G. Clark for the 2008 shooting death of Marcus Sukow has enraged many federal law enforcement officers, who say Clark was heroically coming to the defense of a battered woman.”

Notice the use of the word “hero.”  Since when did murderers hiding behind badges and killing unarmed men in cold blood become heroic? In the old days, shooting an unarmed person was considered cowardly. As some have noted, “Unleashing a hail of hollow-points without those qualifying conditions is the mark of a coward.

I suspect that there is something of an inferiority complex in the mind of every cop, and that leads them to become bullies in search of victims. As I have discussed earlier, they are also prone to latent homosexual idealization that makes them prone to desire physical contact with other men ( and female cops desire as much from women, but that is another subject) and Sigmund Freud might conclude that a male cops desire to “please the father” is at the root of the problem ( pun intended).

There is also a concept in biological science that states that there is a type of animal that, due to its inferior social status, or inferior physical size, seeks to mate with the mates of others,but on the sly, so that they don’t face consequences. I think cops are like that, despite the fact that many of them are religious. This entire event actually mirrors chimpanzee mating mature: females are promiscuous–slutty, in American terms, or generally just ‘different’ ,because everything turns them on,  and some males are violent in order to gain sexual access to those females.[in case you want to study similarities between chimps, and police]

So, cops are very chimp-like and they use the overblown social control mechanism of “domestic violence” to attemp to insert themselves into the relationships that other males have with females, and establish themselves as idealistic “better mates” for those females. And, it appears, that police generally have been having mating success, mating with violence prone, or violence driven females, because the police power has grown in America in the last several decades, OUTSTRIPPING MANUFACTURING, OR OTHER FORMS OF ECONOMIC POWER.[ harassing citizens here, and harassing journalists here; are we facing a police state morality crisis?]

“According to a police affidavit, Clark was leaving his condo when he encountered Sukow and his girlfriend, Marguerite Duncan. They had been drinking and were having a “disagreement.” Duncan asked Clark for a ride to the guard gate and got in Clark’s sports utility vehicle,” and even though Ms. Duncan claims she never asked for or wanted help from that cop, he stayed around to act like a hero.

What we have, then, is a male, who uses a female who is using another male to gain some favor ( an initiator of much domestic violence is womens’ infidelity, or lies, or implied violence via other males).  That secondary male, who has made himself available, and idealizing itself as a hero, complies. Never mind the sort of manipulation that was taking place: that female chose Marcus Sukow, a 260pound man, as an initial mate; never mind that she was asking a cop with a gun for ‘help’; and never mind how that cop complied so readily and so easily–such is the social structure of chimpanzees, and many other great apes.

But what really matters is this: do we as a society want to be governed by people who act like apes? Or by people who uphold ape-like behaviors? If so, we have become an ape-ocracy, not a democracy.

According to both investigations, Sukow struck the ATF agents car with a flashlight, which, in the American mind, justifies the use of deadly force. The cop had many choices he could have made:

1) he first could have-and likely should have–called actual local police ( since when is it the business of the ATF to intervene in domestic disputes? I am certain they sit back, and watch women get abused all the time, especially if intervention could jeopardize some case they are making against a dealer. Hell they sat back and watched as all of Latin America’s women were pimped out, sold, beaten, or otherwise abused when it was in the US interest to sell drugs–remeber Iran-Contra?)

2) he could drive away, and get the woman to safety–if in fact safety of that woman was the issue, and not the cuckoldry of that 260 pound man; or the desire that cops have to seek attention for heroic behavior, even if that means creating that “heroic” act.

3) the cop could have used non-lethal weapons–cops surround themselves with weapons of all kinds, as they perceive the world to be a threatening place ( you should see how slow the internet connection becomes when I punched that phrase in).

4) the cop could shoot the un-armed man dead. Cops love to play with their weapons–a sort of sublimated phallus, and murder for a cop is a sublimated act of sex.

Guess what the American cop did? The cop shot the unarmed man, instead of driving away, using a taser, or calling proper authorities, like any normal American citizen is asked–told– to do.

Both sides agree that the murder took place this way:

“Mr. Sukow stood there with his hands at his side when William Clarke [sic] discharged his firearm at him several times.” Five times, actually.

What would you have done?  And how long and for what will you tolerate this behavior–this mindset that police have a right to not only insert themselves into situations where they may or may not be required, and to kill first? Are you waiting until American democracy has fully  dissolved, or are you in some way to afraid to speak up, or too paid off by capitalistic complacency to notice?

But I know we share this in common: shooting unarmed people was always considered the act of cowards.

My idealism prefers to imagine another way of doing business, but first, we need to get the apes out of the picture. We need to stop fearing the apes, and when we catch those apes doing bad ape-like things, we need to follow the lead of the Virgin Islands, and put those apes behind bars. These American ape-minded police are ruining it for all of us.

In the meantime, if you encounter an ape, or are accosted by a cop, advice for your safety from them harming you is the same as it is for an encounter with a violent ape or a chimp: “The best way of keeping yourself alive after coming across a great ape is to stay calm, try not to scream and avoid running away,” and if that doesn’t work–and if you can get away with it–you can shoot them. They would probably shoot you, if actual chimpanzees could use guns.

But I don’t recommend that–there are enough chimp-like cops  out there doing that already.