…and rape ideology is a powerful tool of social control that can backfire–even on cops.
New York Police Officers Franklin Mata and Kenneth Moreno, likely rapists
You might have missed this story about some rapist cops in New York, Franklin Mata and Kenneth Moreno, while you were following this story, about IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who sits in jail at Rikers Island, likely falsely accused of rape by a woman, a hotel maid who has might have AIDS. Never mind what kind of character is a woman who contracts AIDS; never mind the debate about power and oppression, and women doing what women have always done to make a side dollar–from selling sex, to blackmail; the hard fact is that it looks like a CIA set-up. Or a right-wing French police set-up in full collusion with American police.
The anatomy of a honey-pot set-up, 101
a) create a victim through indoctrination b) plant female victim in proper location ( in this case the Sofitel) c) wait for the right ‘client’ to show up d) go to the press before it goes to trial ( in this case, DSK is being tried in the American press; his “victim’s” lawyer, a personal injury lawyer, has virtually told her whole side of the story in the media, yet we do not have a right to know her name?) e) immediately believe the female victim, and label the male a perpetrator and f) use full police powers of evidence manipulation and to seal the deal against a guy before he even gets bailed out–especially, hide, or otherwise overlook exculpatory evidence that could prove a man innocent before a trial is even needed.
In the case of Strauss-Kahn, he even predicted that his opponents would try to set him up on a rape charge weeks before he came to New York. CNN reports that “Three weeks ago — well before his visit to the New York Sofitel –Strauss-Kahn, who had been considered a leading contender for the French presidential elections next year, discussed the possibility of a woman falsely claiming he attacked her.
In an interview April 28 with the French daily newspaper Liberation, he imagined “a woman who would be raped in a parking lot and who would then be promised 500,000 or a million euros to invent such a story,” the paper reported in an article published Monday, two days after the alleged attempted rape..
So, the “you might have missed it story is the fact that police are being tried as rapists in a rare moment when the police might actually have policed themselves. Well, not the police, directly. The District Attorney is prosecuting the case, so it might be one rare exception to the rule that prosecutors and police are always in collusion together. That’s true 99% of the time, and only when a prosecutor has a slam dunk do they prosecute cops.
Police Officer “Kenneth Moreno, 43, is accused of raping the woman, a fashion executive, as his partner, [Officer] Franklin Mata, 29, stood lookout,” and they might have gotten away with it too, except the woman recorded them conspiring. Rape, the rape ideologists tell us, is a crime of power, and who has more social power than police?
The victim in this case might have turned the tables with her recording. Tape recorders are powerful tools of self defense against police brutality.
“The two were arrested in April 2009 after the victim, using a watch equipped with a microphone, covertly taped a conversation with Moreno in which he said he wore a condom.”
Worse, the cops claimed the woman was too drunk to know what hit her, but once again, her case might be aided by the fact that there is a recorded video and “outdoor surveillance camera footage of the victim entering the apartment building on the night of the incident shows she was more sober than prosecutors allege.”
The jury is out deliberating, but it is rare to see cops prosecuted for their misconduct. Even more rare that a rape claim is substantiated,much less against a cop, but in this case, it looks like the chicken has come home to roost, because rape ideology is a dangerous tool of police strategy, population control, and overall ideology of social control, and it backfired on them here.
“Rape culture is a term used within women’s studies and feminism, describing a culture in which rape and sexual violence against women are common and in which prevalent attitudes, norms, practices, and media condone, normalize, excuse, or tolerate sexual violence against women. Examples of behaviors commonly associated with rape culture include victim blaming and sexual objectification. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia”
Did you notice anything that was left out in that description and definition? No where is there a mention of what women do to children or what women do to men who are under their control. Nowhere is there any statement of the fact that the attitudes, norms, and the practices of our culture, in collusion with the media, and enforced by women who believe in police share any responsiblity for police violence that is directed at men in our society. Violence begets violence.
The one crucial detail that is missing is this: American women uphold, encourage, and instill in their children behaviors that lead to male violence as long as that violence is directed at males. And nowhere in this discussion is there a glimmering of what women can do to children to instill that violence component. What kind of woman raises a cop? Certainly, a Freudian profile explains it a bit, but what does it take to create a person who by its very nature is the progenitor of violent social control?
Police are the primary entities who are the tools, and bi-products of women who believe in violence. They uphold the flawed logic–the fallacy of the “rape culture,” which is a narrowly tailored doctrine that feminists and other politically motivated people have suggested is the basis of American society, if not the worlds society as a whole; and therein lies the rub.
Feminists believe that their holes are the object that men desire, and that men, having power, will do anything to maintain that power, or to hold that power over women. There’s part of the problem: have you ever met a feminist? That’s a hole you don’t ever want to fall into…
The flaw in rape culture logic is that women like power too, and use it over men who fall into relationships with them, and these women excercise that power over the possible or eventual children that are bi-products of those hetero-normative relationships.Women are, and always have been, the primary selectors of mates, and create the biproducts that reflect their values–children who are violent.
Women like failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, helped put the lie of the rape culture into America’s vernacular, and whereas only now are actual rapes being dealt with in places where rape actually take place–like Africa. Women like her also helped put more cops in your homes by stirring up a phantom fear that American women were being raped.
With the mythology of the rape culture, and a street level indoctrination campaign that maintains women are raped far more frequently than actually happens, your police willingly followed her lead. Why? Because statistic generating public fear campaigns are how police and pundits make their living, and so does your mother.
Why? Because “Yo Mama’s so nasty she joined the four horseman: war, death, famine, disease and Yo mama”
Any child of the ghetto culture, and any trailer trash kid [ the primary targets of police violence] can tell you a “yo’ mama” joke, and we could engage in discussions about how those jokes are products of a culture that abuses women, and that these jokes are a symbolic abuse of mothers.
But the reality is, these jokes reflect the common, lived and shared experience of being ‘mothered’ in America. The fact is that this reflection of America is one of the few cracks at the seams of your mamas new jeans, and America condones, accepts, expects, and enforces nasty mothers.
It is primarily women in America who uphold and support the rape culture, because women in America are fully supported–if not outright by government tax dollars and welfare–they are supported by the police structure that inserts itself into the relationships between men and women. And men are often raped, but it is unmanly to talk about it. American women only affirm it.
Forget Betsy Ross, or Martha Washington–our modern nation, America, has found in its women, mothers that are willing allies who create violence prone males and females, and our nation leads the world in undeclared wars, and in deaths caused by invasions of foreign countries.Americas mothers have created children responsible for over one hundred thousand Iraqi’s, another twenty thousand deaths in Afghanistan, and counting in other places around the world. Injuries are upwards of 300, 000.
American mothers excercise power over children, and that power is often abused. It takes a severe form of social dysfunction to allow the creation of murderers. THis, and the fact that the police power and the social mechanisms that uphold it are responsible for the current over-policing of the poor, and the dissenters, is to a point where American citizens recently, and willingly gave up there Constitutional rights against unlawful search and seizure; against unlawful imprisonment without trial; and rights that protected us against torture.
Since when does yo’ mama need permission to come into your bedroom? Neither do the American police. We have nothing to say anymore about how the “enemies of America” abuse civil rights.
Yo mama’s so nasty, the US Government uses her bath water for chemical weapons, and when she didn’t find chemical weapons in Iraq’s bedroom , she invaded anyways and said she did find them; You allowed it. To you, the lie is more important–and more potent, than the truth about yo’ mama.
It seems the lies yo’ mama tells are better than the truth, and the biggest lie we tell in America is about yo’ mama’s creation of police who abuse American citizens. Or maybe the bigger lie we tell is that lie of omission: the fact that women’s threats, women’s violence, and coercive conduct and behavior directed at children creates cops, and creates a police state, and those mothers and those cops sanction the unspeakable crime of rape against men.
But the fact is, Dominique Strauss-Kahn predicted the possibility of being set up, and two of New York’s finest are awaiting their guilty verdict–but you never heard about them, because they are rapists and cops, protected by the media, and birthed by American mothers.
If the honey trap is an acceptable tool of social control, we should use it more often–on cops, before we become everything we were taught to abhor about foreign governments.
Here is a Wikipedia link that appears to be straight out of some lower level CIA handbook, a “How To” manual of recruiting women like the un-named “victim” from Guinea. However despicable rape ideology is as a tool of social control in America, where women can leverage men with false allegations that waste time and resources, rape ideologies most striking failure is to prevent actual rape from happening; its most striking failure to actually describe the problem is most evident in the Congo today, where upwards of millions of rapes have been taking place over the last several years.
So maybe the solution is that we raise girls who become women who accuse police and soldiers of rape, not to even the score, but to balance a society that only upholds police power, and convicts innocent men before due process has run its course, but also protects the names and faces of women who falsely accuse.
American women face no penalties for false allegations, so maybe it’s time to tilt those allegations at the police. One more lie in the American arsenal of untruth does not make a tool, but rather, it is a hammer hit on our own thumbs.
(Just a side-note: as I wrote this post, I was cyber-attacked or hacked three separate times. In each case, many of the words I had typed were not saved to backup, and many of the links I had used had not been auto-saved. Some of my content was lost. At one point, some kind of attack that used the language “infinite loop” occured, and at another point, Google defaulted only to Arabic. Has this attack happened to you? I am sure it is some SigInt prank, but also likely a clear monitoring of dissent in action. Ask yourself what kind of nation you want; I choose one that is truly free, not one leveraged into oblivion by lies, and police state control. Free speech is next.)